Goethite supplemented natural clay ceramic as an alternative proton exchange membrane and its application in microbial fuel cell

被引:0
作者
Indrasis Das
Sovik Das
Rohan Dixit
M. M. Ghangrekar
机构
[1] Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur,Department of Civil Engineering
来源
Ionics | 2020年 / 26卷
关键词
Bioelectricity; Goethite; Microbial fuel cell; Proton exchange membrane; Wastewater treatment;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Microbial fuel cell (MFC) is a bioelectrochemical system, which treats wastewater with simultaneous recovery of bioelectricity. Costly proton exchange membrane, like Nafion-117, brings a serious bottleneck towards the sustainable scaled-up application of this technology. For an appropriate field-scale demonstration of MFC, the fabrication cost needs to be reduced drastically. This can be achieved by using low-cost proton exchange membrane (PEM) in MFCs, which would demonstrate equivalent performance as commercially available expensive PEMs. Such a novel PEM constituting 5% goethite and natural clay as a base material was synthesized, named as G-5, and it was used in MFC as a separator. This G-5 membrane was estimated to be five folds cheaper than the commercially available Nafion-117 membrane, which is popularly used in MFC. Membrane properties, like water and acetate uptake, and proton conductivity of the G-5 membrane, were evaluated and compared with Nafion-117. A power density obtained from the MFC using G-5 as PEM (112.81 ± 8.74 mW/m2) was slightly higher than the MFC with Nafion-117 as PEM (106.95 ± 5.52 mW/m2). Chemical oxygen demand removal and Coulombic efficiency for MFC with G-5 membrane were found to be 22% and 8.6% higher, respectively, in comparison with that of the MFC with Nafion-117 as PEM. Thus, low-cost G-5 membrane demonstrated the potential to be used for scaling-up of MFCs to reduce fabrication cost for successful field-scale implementation of MFCs.
引用
收藏
页码:3061 / 3072
页数:11
相关论文
共 158 条
[41]  
Ghangrekar M.M.(2019)Enhancement of bioelectricity generation and algal productivity in microbial carbon-capture cell using low cost coconut shell as membrane separator Biochem Eng J 148 29-102
[42]  
Rahimnejad M(2013)Comparison of performance and ionic concentration gradient of two-chamber microbial fuel cell using ceramic membrane (CM) and cation exchange membrane (CEM) as separators Ceramica 59 147-13
[43]  
Bakeri G(2012)The Relative Effectiveness of pH Control and Heat Treatment for Enhancing Biohydrogen Gas Production Korean J Chem Eng 29 95-84013
[44]  
Najafpour G(2016)Enhancing electrogenesis by pretreatment of mixed anaerobic sludge to be used as inoculum in microbial fuel cells J Appl Polym Sci 133 1-70
[45]  
Tota-Maharaj K(2015)Degradation of 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid by UV 253.7 and UV-H RSC Adv 5 84004-undefined
[46]  
Paul P(2019)O Int Biodeterior Biodegrad 136 63-undefined
[47]  
Tiwari BR(undefined): Reaction kinetics and effects of interfering substances undefined undefined undefined-undefined
[48]  
Noori MT(undefined)SiOC-based polymer derived-ceramic porous anodes for microbial fuel cells undefined undefined undefined-undefined
[49]  
Ghangrekar MM(undefined)Addition of sedimentary rock to kaolinitic clays: influence on sintering process undefined undefined undefined-undefined
[50]  
Choi MJ(undefined)Arsenic adsorption on goethite nanoparticles produced through hydrazine sulfate assisted synthesis method undefined undefined undefined-undefined