Towards a Framework for Research Ethics Education for Physicians in Serbia

被引:0
|
作者
Tatjana Gazibara
Jelena Dotlic
Dejan Donev
Vida Jeremic Stojkovic
Darija Kisic-Tepavcevic
机构
[1] University of Belgrade,Institute of Epidemiology, School of Medicine
[2] University of Belgrade,Clinic for Obstetrics and Gynecology, Clinical Center of Serbia, School of Medicine
[3] University “St. Cyril and Methodius”,Institute for Philosophy, School of Philosophy
[4] University of Belgrade,Department of Humanities, School of Medicine
来源
Science and Engineering Ethics | 2020年 / 26卷
关键词
Curriculum; Education; Ethics; Medicine; Research;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
With growing opportunities for medical doctors to work either in academia and industry, research ethics education for health sciences research, meaning research which includes humans and animals and/or their tissues and cells with the goal to understand underlying mechanisms of disease occurrence and disease treatment, is of paramount importance, especially in regions, such as Serbia, where comprehensive research ethics curricula for physician researchers are lacking. This article addresses the spectrum of research ethics topics that were identified through analysis of the existing research ethics curricula in medical schools, international organizations, Serbian legislative codes and the PubMed database applying the key search terms: ethics, research, biomedical, education, curriculum, program, course and their combinations. Selected topics were classified in eight syllabi based on their similarity: #1 Responsible conduct of research, #2 Justice in human subjects research, #3 Research on human subjects, #4 Vulnerable population groups, #5 Conflict of interest, #6 Research on animals, #7 Research on genes, cells and embryos, and #8 Organization of research ethics. Justifications for each syllabus are discussed based on empirical evidence and local context. Higher education authorities could use this framework to strengthen, adjust or refine research ethics education for physician researchers in Serbia.
引用
收藏
页码:1249 / 1266
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] BUSINESS EDUCATION AND ETHICS: ESTABLISHING A FRAMEWORK FOR ETHICS INCLUSION IN CURRICULA
    Cavanagh, Jillian
    Gharavi, Hosein
    3RD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF EDUCATION, RESEARCH AND INNOVATION (ICERI2010), 2010, : 879 - 886
  • [32] The Ethics of Disruptive Technologies: Towards a General Framework
    Hopster, Jeroen
    NEW TRENDS IN DISRUPTIVE TECHNOLOGIES, TECH ETHICS AND ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE: THE DITTET COLLECTION, 2022, 1410 : 133 - 144
  • [33] The Framework of Family Therapy in Clinical Practice and Research in Serbia
    Pantovic, Maja
    Dunjic-Kostic, Bojana
    Ivkovic, Maja
    Damjanovic, Aleksandar
    Jovanovic, Aleksandar A.
    INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF PSYCHIATRY, 2012, 24 (02) : 86 - 90
  • [34] Towards the regulation of Research Ethics Boards
    Bevan, JC
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA-JOURNAL CANADIEN D ANESTHESIE, 2002, 49 (09): : 900 - 906
  • [35] Towards Improving the Ethics of Ecological Research
    G. K. D. Crozier
    Albrecht I. Schulte-Hostedde
    Science and Engineering Ethics, 2015, 21 : 577 - 594
  • [36] A special section on research in engineering ethics towards a research programme for ethics and technology
    Michiel Brumsen
    Ibo van de Poel
    Science and Engineering Ethics, 2001, 7 : 365 - 378
  • [37] Developing an Islamic Research Ethics Framework
    Rattani, Abbas
    Hyder, Adnan A.
    JOURNAL OF RELIGION & HEALTH, 2019, 58 (01): : 74 - 86
  • [38] ETHICS IN ORGANIZATIONS - A FRAMEWORK FOR THEORY AND RESEARCH
    NICHOLSON, N
    JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS, 1994, 13 (08) : 581 - 596
  • [39] Ethics in Online Research; Evaluating the ESRC Framework for Research Ethics Categorisation of Risk
    Orton-Johnson, Kate
    SOCIOLOGICAL RESEARCH ONLINE, 2010, 15 (04):
  • [40] RESEARCH ETHICS IN PLANNING: A FRAMEWORK FOR DISCUSSION
    Lo Piccolo, Francesco
    Thomas, Huw
    PLANNING THEORY, 2008, 7 (01) : 7 - 23