The implementation of Water Alternating (WAG) injection to obtain optimum recovery in Cornea Field, Australia

被引:12
作者
Abdullah, Nurafiqah [1 ]
Hasan, Nurul [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Teknol Brunei, PCE, Brunei Muara, Brunei
关键词
Water Alternating Gas (WAG); Sweep efficiency; Hysteresis; Two-phase model; NUMERICAL-SIMULATION; GAS;
D O I
10.1007/s13202-021-01103-7
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
The Water Alternating Gas (WAG) process is a cyclic process of injecting alternating water followed by gas. The main purpose of WAG injection is to improve both macroscopic and microscopic sweep efficiency, maintaining nearly initial high pressure, slow down the gas breakthrough and reduced oil viscosity. WAG injection also decreases the residual oil saturation resulted from the flow of three phases and effects associated with relative permeability hysteresis. The study area is in the Cornea Field located in Browse Basin, Western Australia. This study is conducted because there is no investigation on WAG injection feasibility in this field. In this study, two-phase bounding imbibition and drainage relative permeability model (Stone 1 and Stone 2) along with two-phase hysteresis model (Land, Carlson or Killough) were used. From the result, Carlson two-phase hysteresis model with Stone 1 correlation shows more oil was recovered. Therefore, it is a feasible model to be used compared with other models. From sensitivity analysis, it shows that highest oil was recovered at WAG ratio 1:1. Since it is a miscible reservoir, 1:1 ratio is more efficient and it is insensitive to trapping. Also, oil production increased with the shortest WAG cycle time at 180 days due to minimum miscibility pressure reached. In addition, it is best to inject water as the first phase to be injected into the reservoir compared to CO 2 because water has high mobility ratio while CO 2 can result in early breakthrough in the reservoir.
引用
收藏
页码:1475 / 1485
页数:11
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]  
Aghdam K. A., 2017, J Pet Sci Technol, V7, P3, DOI [10.22078/jpst.2017.799, DOI 10.22078/JPST.2017.799]
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2015, THESIS
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2010, REPORT W
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2008, OIL ENERGY TRENDS, V33, P1, DOI [10.1111/j.1744-7992.2008.330113.x, DOI 10.1111/J.1744-7992.2008.330113.X]
[5]  
Asasira, 2019, INT J ATMOS OCEAN SC, V2, P27
[6]  
Bahmanbeglo JT, 2014, SCI RES PUBL, V5, P25
[7]   Water alternating gas incremental recovery factor prediction and WAG pilot lessons learned [J].
Belazreg, Lazreg ;
Mahmood, Syed Mohammad .
JOURNAL OF PETROLEUM EXPLORATION AND PRODUCTION TECHNOLOGY, 2020, 10 (02) :249-269
[8]   Adsorption of surfactants on sand surface in enhanced oil recovery: Isotherms, kinetics and thermodynamic studies [J].
Bera, Achinta ;
Kumar, T. ;
Ojha, Keka ;
Mandal, Ajay .
APPLIED SURFACE SCIENCE, 2013, 284 :87-99
[9]   Production performance of water alternate gas injection techniques for enhanced oil recovery: effect of WAG ratio, number of WAG cycles and the type of injection gas [J].
Bhatia, Jigar ;
Srivastava, J. P. ;
Sharma, Abhay ;
Sangwai, Jitendra S. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OIL GAS AND COAL TECHNOLOGY, 2014, 7 (02) :132-151
[10]  
Fabusuyi, 2013, COMPOSITION FLUID FL, P91