Choice of measurement locations for a nonlinear coupled axial–torsional drill string using proper orthogonal modes and effective independence strategy

被引:0
作者
T. G. Ritto
机构
[1] Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro,Department of Mechanical Engineering
来源
Journal of the Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering | 2019年 / 41卷
关键词
Sensor placement; Coupled axial–torsional dynamics; Effective independence; Drill string nonlinear dynamics; Dimensionless parameters;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Drill strings are used to search for oil and gas reservoirs. Its dynamic behavior has been the subject of many investigations. In particular, this paper is interested in choosing measurement locations, and a nonlinear coupled axial–torsional dynamic computational model is used for this purpose. Wired drill pipe technology is a reality, and we would like to take advantage of multiple points of measurements to better understand and control the drill string dynamics. This paper proposes to apply the proper orthogonal modes and the effective independence strategy, which automatically choose the measurement locations in an optimal manner. The dynamic response of the computational model is used to construct the proper orthogonal modes (POMs) obtained by means of the proper orthogonal decomposition. And the effective independence distribution vector procedure is employed to eliminate, iteratively, locations that contribute less for the independence of the target POMs. In addition, nondimensional parameters are proposed for the system, aiming at a more general analysis. The results show that, if few sensors are available, one sensor should be placed close to the bit (which is usually the case) and the others should be distributed along the drill pipe.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 52 条
  • [1] Bellizzi A(2006)POM analysis of randomly vibrating systems obtained from Karhunen–Loève expansion J Sound Vib 297 774-793
  • [2] Sampaio R(2012)Placement of sensors in operational modal analysis for truss bridges Mech Syst Signal Process 31 196-216
  • [3] Debnath N(1994)Chapter 9 measurement while drilling Dev Pet Sci 38 251-279
  • [4] Dutta A(2015)Clustering of sensor locations using the effective independence method AIAA J 53 1388-1390
  • [5] Deb S(2009)Nonlinear drillstring dynamics analysis SIAM J Appl Dyn Syst 8 527-553
  • [6] Desbrandes R(1991)Sensor placements for on-orbit modal identification and correlation of large space structures J Guid Control Dyn 14 251-259
  • [7] Clayton R(2005)The method of proper orthogonal decomposition for dynamical characterization and order reduction of mechanical systems: an overview Nonlinear Dyn 41 147-169
  • [8] Friswell M(2002)Stick-slip whirl interaction in drillstring dynamics J Vib Acoust 124 209-220
  • [9] Castro-Triguero R(2008)Optimal sensor placement methods and metrics—comparison and implementation on a timber frame structure Struct Infrastruct Eng 14 997-1010
  • [10] Germay C(1994)Automatic choice of measurement locations for dynamic testing AIAA J 32 407-414