Global science, national research, and the question of university rankings

被引:23
作者
Hazelkorn E. [1 ]
Gibson A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Higher Education Policy Research Unit, Dublin
关键词
D O I
10.1057/s41599-017-0011-6
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Science has always operated in a competitive environment, but the globalisation of knowledge and the rising popularity and use of global rankings have elevated this competition to a new level. The quality, performance and productivity of higher education and university-based research have become a national differentiator in the global knowledge economy. Global rankings essentially measure levels of wealth and investment in higher education, and they reflect the realisation that national pre-eminence is no longer sufficient. These developments also correspond with increased public scrutiny and calls for greater transparency, underpinned by growing necessity to demonstrate value, impact and benefit. Despite on-going criticism of methodologies, and scepticism about their overall role, rankings are informing and influencing policy-making, academic behaviour, stakeholder opinions-and our collective understanding of science. This article examines the inter-relationship and tensions between the national and the global in the context of the influences between higher education and global university rankings. It starts with a discussion of the globalisation of knowledge and the rise of rankings. It then moves on to consider rankings in the context of wider discourse relating to quality and measuring scholarly activity, both within academia and by governments. The next section examines the relationship and tensions between research assessment and rankings, in policy and practice. It concludes by discussing the broader implications for higher education and university-based research. © 2017 The Author(s).
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 134 条
[1]  
Abramo G., D'Angelo C.A., The VQR, Italy's Second National Research Assessment: Methodological Failures and Ranking Distortions, Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 66, 11, pp. 2202-2214, (2015)
[2]  
Adler N.J., Harzing A.W., When knowledge wins: Transcending the sense and nonsense of academic rankings, Acad Manag Learn Educ, 8, 1, pp. 72-95, (2009)
[3]  
ERA Research Excellence Rankings, (2015)
[4]  
Alphonso C., Universities Boycott Maclean's Rankings. In: The Globe and Mail, (2006)
[5]  
Altbach P.G., The Dilemmas of Ranking, International Higher Education, 42, (2006)
[6]  
Altbach P.G., The Globalization of College and University Rankings, Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 44, 1, pp. 26-31, (2012)
[7]  
Arai K., Cech T., Chameau J.L., Horn P., Mattaj I., Potocnik J., Wiley J., The future of research universities. Is the model of research-intensive universities still valid at the beginning of the twenty-first century?, EMBO Rep, 8, 9, pp. 804-810, (2007)
[8]  
Audretsch D.B., Knowledge, globalization, and regions, Regions, Globalization, and the Knowledge-based Economy, pp. 63-81, (2000)
[9]  
Baker D.P., The Schooled Society: The Educational Transformation of Global Culture, (2014)
[10]  
Becher T., Trowler P.R., Academic Tribes and Territories, (2001)