Robotic surgery in ear nose and throat

被引:0
作者
Amit Parmar
David G. Grant
Peter Loizou
机构
[1] Southmead Hospital,Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery
来源
European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology | 2010年 / 267卷
关键词
Robotics; ENT; Otolaryngology; Robot;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The arrival of a commercial surgical robotic platform at our institution has raised the question of its application and usefulness within the department of otolaryngology head and neck surgery. In order to answer this question, we sought to perform a qualitative review to examine the evolution of commercial surgical robotics and examine present and future applications of this emerging technology within our specialty. The main objective of this study is to examine the development and application of robotic surgery in otolaryngology, head and neck surgery. The study includes a qualitative systematic review. We have reviewed research papers and studies that specifically relate to the use of robots in otorhinolaryngology. More specifically, we have attempted to review those studies that have significantly added to the development of this field. In summary, we have examined eight animal studies, six cadaveric studies, nine human trials. Robotic surgery in ENT is a safe and feasible option. In certain procedures, it offers significant benefits over conventional surgery. Instrument and robotic arm size, and costs are limiting factors that prevent the use of robots being applied to many additional ENT procedures. We feel the development of new speciality-specific robots will yield a new era in the common use of robotics in ENT.
引用
收藏
页码:625 / 633
页数:8
相关论文
共 108 条
[1]  
Herron DM(2008)A consensus document on robotic surgery Surg Endosc 22 313-325
[2]  
Marohn M(1990)A prototype medical workstation for computer-assisted stereotactic neurosurgery Stereotact Funct Neurosurg 54–55 493-496
[3]  
Gybels J(1991)Computer- and robot-assisted resection of thalamic astrocytomas in children Neurosurgery 29 27-33
[4]  
Vandermeulen D(2008)Trainees do not negatively impact the institutional learning curve for robotic prostatectomy as characterized by operative time, estimated blood loss, and positive surgical margin rate Urology 71 597-601
[5]  
Suetens P(1995)Robots in operating theatres BMJ 311 1479-1482
[6]  
Marchal G(1995)An automatic technique for micro-drilling a stapedotomy in the flexible stapes footplate Proc Inst Mech Eng [H] 209 255-262
[7]  
Wilms G(2008)Robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy: outcome and cost analyses of a case-matched control study Ann Surg 247 987-993
[8]  
Drake JM(2004)Application of robotics in general surgery: initial experience Am Surg 70 914-917
[9]  
Joy M(2008)The current status of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy Asian J Androl 11 90-93
[10]  
Goldenberg A(2008)Pediatric robotic surgery: a single-institutional review of the first 100 consecutive cases Surg Endosc 22 177-182