The Evolution of Conditional Dispersal Strategies in Spatially Heterogeneous Habitats

被引:0
作者
R. Hambrock
Y. Lou
机构
[1] Ohio State University,Department of Mathematics
[2] Ohio State University,Department of Mathematics, Mathematical Bioscience Institute
来源
Bulletin of Mathematical Biology | 2009年 / 71卷
关键词
Evolution of dispersal; Reaction; Advection; Competition;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
To understand the evolution of dispersal, we study a Lotka–Volterra reaction–diffusion–advection model for two competing species in a heterogeneous environment. The two species are assumed to be identical except for their dispersal strategies: both species disperse by random diffusion and advection along environmental gradients, but with slightly different random dispersal or advection rates. Two new phenomena are found for one-dimensional habitats and monotone intrinsic growth rates: (i) If both species disperse only by random diffusion, i.e., no advection, it was well known that the slower diffuser always wins. We show that if both species have the same advection rate which is suitably large, the faster dispersal will evolve; (ii) If both species have the same random dispersal rate, it was known that the species with a little advection along the resource gradient always wins, provided that the other species is a pure random disperser and the habitat is convex. We show that if both species have the same random dispersal rate and both also have suitably large advection rates, the species with a little smaller advection rate always wins. Implications of these results for the habitat choices of species will be discussed. Some future directions and open problems will be addressed.
引用
收藏
页码:1793 / 1817
页数:24
相关论文
共 114 条
  • [1] Amarasekare P.(2008)Spatial dynamics of foodwebs Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 39 479-500
  • [2] Armsworth P.R.(2005)The impact of directed versus random movement on population dynamics and biodiversity patterns Am. Nat. 165 449-465
  • [3] Roughgarden J.E.(2005)Disturbance induces the contrasting evolution of reinforcement and dispersiveness in directed and random movers Evolution 59 2083-2096
  • [4] Armsworth P.R.(2007)Designing marine reserves for interacting species: Insights from theory Biol. Conserv. 137 163-179
  • [5] Roughgarden J.E.(1995)The effects of dispersal along environmental gradients on the dynamics of populations in heterogeneous environment Can. Appl. Math. Q. 3 379-397
  • [6] Baskett M.L.(2005)Causes and consequences of animal dispersal strategies: relating individual behavior to spatial dynamics Biol. Rev. 80 205-225
  • [7] Micheli F.(2006)Movement towards better environments and the evolution of rapid diffusion Math. Biosci. 204 199-214
  • [8] Levin S.A.(2007)The ideal free distribution as an evolutionarily stable strategy J. Biol. Dyn. 1 249-271
  • [9] Belgacem F.(2007)Advection mediated coexistence of competing species Proc. R. Soc. Edinb. A 137 497-518
  • [10] Cosner C.(2008)Approximating the ideal free distribution via reaction–diffusion–advection equations J. Differ. Equ. 245 3687-3703