“Media, politics and science policy: MS and evidence from the CCSVI Trenches”

被引:0
作者
Daryl Pullman
Amy Zarzeczny
André Picard
机构
[1] Memorial University,Division of Community Health and Humanities, Faculty of Medicine
[2] University of Regina,undefined
[3] The Globe and Mail,undefined
来源
BMC Medical Ethics | / 14卷
关键词
Multiple sclerosis; CCSVI; Liberation therapy; Priority setting; Public pressure; Media; Politics; Evidence;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 64 条
[1]  
Secko D(2009)Informed consent in biobank research: A deliberative approach to the debate Soc Sci and Medicine 68 781-789
[2]  
Preto N(2012)Personal Privacy, Public Benefits, and Biobanks: A conjoint analysis of policy priorities and public perceptions Genetics and Medicine 14 229-235
[3]  
Niemeyer S(2009)Chronic cerebrospinal venous insufficiency in patients with multiple sclerosis J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 80 392-399
[4]  
Burgess M(2010)No cerebrocervical venous congestion in patients with multiple sclerosis Ann Neurol 68 173-183
[5]  
Pullman D(2010)Venous and cerebrospinal fluid flow in multiple sclerosis: A case–control study AnnNeurol 68 255-259
[6]  
Etchegary H(2011)Complications in MS patients after CCSVI procedures abroad (Calgary, AB) Can J Neurol Sci 38 741-746
[7]  
Gallgher K(2011)Chronic cerebrospinal venous insufficiency and multiple sclerosis: science or science fiction? J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 82 355-411
[8]  
Hodgkinson K(2011)The rise of people power Nature 472 410-1825
[9]  
Keough M(2011)Chronic cerebrospinal venous insufficiency: A Kuhnian paradigm shift or another fad? CMAJ 183 1824-519
[10]  
Morgan D(2005)Regional variation of multiple sclerosis prevalence in Canada Multiple Sclerosis 11 516-E1212