A phylogeny of the Platyhelminthes: towards a total-evidence solution

被引:0
作者
D. T. J. Littlewood
R. A. Bray
K. A. Clough
机构
[1] The Natural History Museum,1 Department of Zoology
[2] University of London,2 Division of Life Sciences, King's College
来源
Hydrobiologia | 1998年 / 383卷
关键词
Platyhelminthes; total-evidence; phylogeny; ultrastructure; rRNA; cladistics;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
We advocate a total-evidence approach for the reconstruction of working phylogenies for the Turbellaria and the phylum Platyhelminthes. Few morphology-based character matrices are available in the systematic literature concerning flatworms, and molecular-based phylogenies are rapidly providing the only means by which we can estimate phylogenies cladistically. Character matrices based on gross morphology and ultrastructure are required and should be internally consistent, i.e. character coding should follow a set of a priori guidelines and character duplication and contradiction is avoided. In order to test our molecular phylogenies we need complementary data sets from morphology. To understand morphological homology we need phylogenetic evidence from independent (e.g. molecular) data. Fully complementary morphological and molecular data sets enable us to validate phylogenetic hypotheses and the combination of these sets in phylogenetic reconstruction utilises all statements of homology. Working phylogenies which include all phylogenetic information not only shed light on individual character evolution, but form a strong basis for comparative studies investigating the origin and evolutionary radiation of the taxonomic group under scrutiny.
引用
收藏
页码:155 / 160
页数:5
相关论文
共 86 条
[1]  
Bandoni S. M.(1987)Revision and phylogenetic analysis of the Gyrocotylidea Poche, 1926 (Platyhelminthes: Cercomeria: Cercomeromorpha) Can. J. Zool. 65 2369-2389
[2]  
Brooks D. R.(1987)Revision and phylogenetic analysis of the Amphilinidea Poche, 1922 (Platyhelminthes: Cercomeria: Cercomeromorpha) Can. J. Zool. 65 1110-1128
[3]  
Bandoni S. M.(1991)Conflicting phylogenetic hypotheses for the parasitic platyhelminths tested by partial sequencing of 18S ribosomal RNA Int. J. Parasitol. 21 329-339
[4]  
Brooks D. R.(1993)The phylogenetic position of the Aspidobothrea within the parasitic flatworms inferred from ribosomal RNA sequence data Int. J. Parasitol. 23 169-178
[5]  
Baverstock P. R.(1996)Evolutionary biology of parasitic platyhelminths: the role of molecular phylogenetics Parasitol. Today 12 66-71
[6]  
Fielke R.(1985)The phylogeny of the Cercomeria Brooks, 1982 (Platyhelminthes) Proc. Helminthol. Soc. Wash. 52 1-20
[7]  
Johnson A. M.(1985)The phylogeny of the Digenea (Platyhelminthes: Cercomeria) with comments on their adaptive radiation Can. J. Zool. 63 411-443
[8]  
Bray R. A.(1993)Partitioning and combining data in phylogenetic analysis Syst. Biol. 42 384-397
[9]  
Beveridge I.(1978)Cases in which parsimony or compatibility methods will be positively misleading Syst. Zool. 27 401-410
[10]  
Blair D.(1995)Larval planktotrophy - a primitive trait in the Bilateria? Acta zool. 76 141-154