Abdominal sacral colpopexy versus sacrospinous ligament fixation: a cost-effectiveness analysis

被引:0
作者
Mika S. Ohno
Monica L. Richardson
Eric R. Sokol
机构
[1] Stanford University School of Medicine,Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology
来源
International Urogynecology Journal | 2016年 / 27卷
关键词
Apical prolapse; Cost-effectiveness; Decision analysis; Modeling;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
引用
收藏
页码:233 / 237
页数:4
相关论文
共 62 条
[1]  
Jones KA(2010)Trends in inpatient prolapse procedures in the United States, 1979–2006 Am J Obstet Gynecol 200 501.e1-7
[2]  
Shepherd JP(2013)Apical prolapse Int Urogynecol J 24 1815-1833
[3]  
Oliphant SS(2013)To sling or not to sling at the time of abdominal sacrocolpopexy: a cost-effectiveness analysis J Urol 190 1306-1312
[4]  
Wang L(2012)Robot-assisted versus open sacrocolpopexy: a cost-minimization analysis J Urol 187 638-643
[5]  
Bunker CH(1999)Utility scores for chronic conditions in a community-dwelling population Pharmacoeconomics 15 369-376
[6]  
Lowder JL(2013)Cost-effectiveness analysis comparing robotic sacrocolpopexy to a vaginal mesh hysteropexy for treatment of uterovaginal prolapse Open J Obstet Gynecol 3 613-620
[7]  
Barber MD(1989)Methodology for measuring health-state preferences – II: Scaling methods J Clin Epidemiol 42 459-471
[8]  
Maher C(1996)Vaginal versus abdominal reconstructive surgery for the treatment of pelvic support defects: a prospective randomized study with long-term outcome evaluation Am J Obstet Gynecol 175 1418-1422
[9]  
Richardson ML(1998)Abdominal colposacropexy and sacrospinous ligament suspension for severe uterovaginal prolapse: a comparison J Gynecol Surg 14 59-64
[10]  
Elliott CS(2004)Abdominal sacral colpopexy or vaginal sacrospinous colpopexy for vaginal vault prolapse: a prospective randomized study Am J Obstet Gynecol 190 20-26