Approaches to motivate physicians and nurses in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic literature review

被引:0
作者
Jaya Gupta
Mariya C. Patwa
Angel Khuu
Andreea A. Creanga
机构
[1] Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health,
[2] Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health,undefined
[3] Johns Hopkins School of Medicine,undefined
来源
Human Resources for Health | / 19卷
关键词
Health worker motivation; Workforce; Supportive supervision; Systematic review; Low- and middle-income countries;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Poor health worker motivation, and the resultant shortages and geographic imbalances of providers, impedes the provision of quality care in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). This systematic review summarizes the evidence on interventions used to motivate health workers in LMICs. A standardized keyword search strategy was employed across five databases from September 2007 -September 2017. Studies had to meet the following criteria: original study; doctors and/or nurses as target population for intervention(s); work motivation as study outcome; study design with clearly defined comparison group; categorized as either a supervision, compensation, systems support, or lifelong learning intervention; and conducted in a LMIC setting. Two independent reviewers screened 3845 titles and abstracts and, subsequently, reviewed 269 full articles. Seven studies were retained from China (n = 1), Ghana (n = 2), Iran (n = 1), Mozambique (n = 1), and Zambia (n = 2). Study data and risk of bias were extracted using a standardized form. Though work motivation was the primary study outcome, four studies did not provide an outcome definition and five studies did not describe use of a theoretical framework in the ascertainment. Four studies used a randomized trial—group design, one used a non-randomized trial—group design, one used a cross-sectional design, and one used a pretest–posttest design. All three studies that found a significant positive effect on motivational outcomes had a supervision component. Of the three studies that found no effects on motivation, two were primarily compensation interventions and the third was a systems support intervention. One study found a significant negative effect of a compensation intervention on health worker motivation. In conducting this systematic review, we found there is limited evidence on successful interventions to motivate health workers in LMICs. True effects on select categories of health workers may have been obscured given that studies included health workers with a wide range of social and professional characteristics. Robust studies that use validated and culturally appropriate tools to assess worker motivation are greatly needed in the Sustainable Development Goals era.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 170 条
[1]  
Rao M(2011)Human resources for health in India Lancet 377 587-598
[2]  
Rao KD(2012)So many, yet few Human resources for health in India Human Resourc Health. 10 19-112
[3]  
Kumar AS(2013)Health workforce in India: assessment of availability, production and distribution WHO South-East Asia J Public Health 2 106-1990
[4]  
Chatterjee M(2004)Human resources for health: overcoming the crisis Lancet 364 P1984-215
[5]  
Sundararaman T(1993)The Blais inventory of work motivation Revue québécoise de psychologie 14 185-23
[6]  
Rao KD(2001)Specific relationships between work characteristics and intrinsic work motivation, burnout and turnover intention: a multi-sample analysis Eur J Work Org Psychol 10 1-226
[7]  
Bhatnagar A(2008)Incentives for retaining and motivating health workers in Pacific and Asian countries Human Resourc Health 6 18-1266
[8]  
Berman P(2008)Motivation and retention of health workers in developing countries: a systematic review BMC Health Serv Res 8 247-372
[9]  
Hazarika I(2009)Work Extrinsic and Intrinsic Motivation scale: its value for organizational psychology research Can J Behav Sci 41 213-485
[10]  
Chen L(2002)Health sector reform and public sector health worker motivation: a conceptual framework Soc Sci Med 54 1255-287