Regulating forced labour and combating human trafficking: the relevance of historical definitions in a contemporary perspective

被引:0
作者
Natalia Ollus
机构
[1] University of Turku,European Institute for Crime Prevention and Control, affiliated with the United Nations (HEUNI) and PhD candidate, Faculty of Law
来源
Crime, Law and Social Change | 2015年 / 63卷
关键词
Migrant Worker; Sexual Exploitation; Human Trafficking; Labour Exploitation; Transnational Organize Crime;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Forced labour has been regulated since 1930 on the basis of the ILO Convention on Forced Labour, and since 1957 on the basis of the ILO Abolition of Forced Labour Convention. In 2000 forced labour was included as one form of exploitation covered by the UN Trafficking Protocol, which situated trafficking into a context of transnational organised crime. In 2014 the ILO adopted a Protocol on Forced Labour, making a link between trafficking and forced labour. The aim of this article is to explore how forced labour came to be regulated and defined in these four treaties. The 1930 ILO Convention came about in a specific historical and political context, yet the 1930 definition remains in use even though the interpretation of forced labour, particularly as it relates to trafficking, has changed. This article focuses on the issue of trafficking for the purpose of forced labour within the context of migration and labour exploitation, and discusses the relevance of historical definitions of forced labour in the current discourse that sees human trafficking mainly as a security threat. It argues that a rigid interpretation of forced labour is not always useful in understanding forms of labour exploitation, at least in a contemporary European migratory perspective. The article calls for a broad interpretation of forced labour, which takes into account also subtle forms of control and coercion.
引用
收藏
页码:221 / 246
页数:25
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]  
Aas KF(2011)Crimmigrant’ bodies and bona fide travellers: surveillance, citizenship and global governance Theoretical Criminology 15 331-346
[2]  
Albrecht H-J(2002)Fortress Europe? Controlling illegal immigration European Journal of Crime, Criminal Law and Criminal Justice 10 1-22
[3]  
Aradau C(2004)The perverse politics of four-letter words: risk and pity in the securitisation of human trafficking Millennium: Journal of International Studies 33 251-277
[4]  
Bravo KE(2009)Free labor! A labor liberalization solution to modern trafficking in humans Transnational Law and Contemporary Problems 18 545-616
[5]  
Bruch EM(2004)Models wanted: the search for an effective response to human trafficking Stanford Journal of International Law 40 1-45
[6]  
Chou M-H(2008)The European Union and the fight against human trafficking: comprehensive or contradicting? STAIR (St Anthony’s International Review) 4 79-95
[7]  
Gallagher A(2001)Human rights and the new UN protocols on trafficking and migrant smuggling: a preliminary analysis Human Rights Quarterly 23 975-1004
[8]  
Goudal J(1929)The question of forced labour before the international labour conference International Labour Review XIX 621-638
[9]  
Haynes DF(2009)Exploitation nation: the thin and grey legal lines between trafficked persons and abused migrant laborers Notre Dame Journal of Legal Ethics and Public Policy 23 1-71
[10]  
Howard N(2008)Editorial introduction: the politics of human trafficking STAIR (St Anthony’s International Review) 4 5-15