Prospects for combining immune checkpoint blockade with PARP inhibition

被引:0
作者
Anping Li
Ming Yi
Shuang Qin
Qian Chu
Suxia Luo
Kongming Wu
机构
[1] The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University & Henan Cancer Hospital,Department of Medical Oncology
[2] Huazhong University of Science and Technology,Department of Oncology, Tongji Hospital of Tongji Medical College
来源
Journal of Hematology & Oncology | / 12卷
关键词
PARP inhibitor; DNA damage response; PD-1; PD-L1; CTLA-4; Immunotherapy; Combination therapy; Tumor immune microenvironment;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The immunogenicity of a cancer cell is derived from accumulated somatic mutations. However, on the contrary to increased immunogenicity, anti-cancer immune response tends to be feeble. This impaired anti-cancer immunity could be attributed to multiple factors including loss of immunodominant epitopes, downregulation of major histocompatibility complex, and immunosuppressive microenvironment, as well as aberrant negative co-stimulatory signals. Immune checkpoint inhibitors block negative co-stimulatory signals such as programmed cell death-1 and cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4, ultimately reactivating anti-cancer immunity. Immune checkpoint inhibitors elicit potent anti-cancer effect and have been approved for multiple cancers. Nevertheless, there still are significant potential improvements for the applications of checkpoint inhibitor, especially considering frequent resistance. Recent studies demonstrated that additional PARP inhibition could alleviate resistance and enhance efficacy of immune checkpoint blockade therapy via promoting cross-presentation and modifying immune microenvironment. We proposed that PARP inhibitors could enhance the priming and tumor-killing activities of T cell, boost the whole cancer-immunity cycle, and thereby improve the response to immune checkpoint blockade. In this review, we focused the latest understanding of the effect of PARP inhibitors on anti-cancer immunity and PARP inhibitors combining immune checkpoint blockade therapy. Moreover, we summarized the preclinical and clinical evidence and discussed the feasibility of this combination therapy in future clinical practice.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 628 条
[91]  
Song Y(2018)PD-1 blockade with cemiplimab in advanced cutaneous squamous-cell carcinoma N Engl J Med 379 3759-319
[92]  
Chu Q(2019)PARP inhibitors: extending benefit beyond BRCA-mutant cancers Clin Cancer Res 25 2334-297
[93]  
Wu K(2016)Immune activation and response to pembrolizumab in POLE-mutant endometrial cancer J Clin Invest 126 13587-3427
[94]  
Eustermann S(2016)Association and prognostic significance of BRCA1/2-mutation status with neoantigen load, number of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes and expression of PD-1/PD-L1 in high grade serous ovarian cancer Oncotarget 7 1685-943
[95]  
Wu WF(2018)Alterations in DNA damage response and repair genes as potential marker of clinical benefit from PD-1/PD-L1 blockade in advanced urothelial cancers J Clin Oncol 36 675-1228
[96]  
Langelier MF(2017)DNA damage and repair biomarkers of immunotherapy response Cancer Discov 7 1094-80.e5
[97]  
Yang JC(2013)Cyclic [G(2’,5’)pA(3’,5’)p] is the metazoan second messenger produced by DNA-activated cyclic GMP-AMP synthase Cell 153 760-53
[98]  
Easton LE(2015)STING: infection, inflammation and cancer Nat Rev Immunol 15 788-811
[99]  
Riccio AA(2009)STING regulates intracellular DNA-mediated, type I interferon-dependent innate immunity Nature 461 5328-1457
[100]  
Stewart RA(2014)Cytosolic-DNA-mediated, STING-dependent proinflammatory gene induction necessitates canonical NF-kappaB activation through TBK1 J Virol 88 405-247