Management of Reproductive Tract Anomalies

被引：11

作者：

Kachhawa G. ^{[1
]}

Kriplani A. ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi

来源：

The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India | 2017年 / 67卷 / 3期

关键词：

Genital tract abnormality; Mullerian anomaly; Uterine malformation;

D O I：

10.1007/s13224-017-1001-8

中图分类号：

学科分类号：

摘要：

Reproductive tract malformations are rare in general population but are commonly encountered in women with infertility and recurrent pregnancy loss. Obstructive anomalies present around menarche causing extreme pain and adversely affecting the life of the young women. The clinical signs, symptoms and reproductive problems depend on the anatomic distortions, which may range from congenital absence of the vagina to complex defects in the lateral and vertical fusion of the Müllerian duct system. Identification of symptoms and timely diagnosis are an important key to the management of these defects. Although MRI being gold standard in delineating uterine anatomy, recent advances in imaging technology, specifically 3-dimensional ultrasound, achieve accurate diagnosis. Surgical management depend on the type of anomaly, its complexity and the proper embryological interpretation of the anomaly and involves multiple specialties; thus, patients should be referred to centres with experience in the treatment of complex genital malformations. © 2017, Federation of Obstetric & Gynecological Societies of India.

引用

页码：162 / 167

页数：5

共 25 条

[1]

Christopoulos P., Fotopoulou G., Gazouli M., Et al., Genetic basis for the development of Mullerian abnormalities: a review of current evidence, Eur J Obstet Gynecol, 5, pp. 7-12, (2010)

[2]

Acien P., Acien M.I., The history of female genital tract malformation classifications and proposal of an updated system, Hum Reprod Update, 17, 5, pp. 693-705, (2011)

[3]

Vallerie A., Breech L., Update in Mullerian anomalies: diagnosis, management, and outcomes, Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol, 22, pp. 381-387, (2010)

[4]

Saravelos S.H., Cocksedge K.A., Li T.C., Prevalence and diagnosis of congenital uterine anomalies in women with reproductive failure: a critical appraisal, Hum Reprod Update, 14, 5, pp. 415-429, (2008)

[5]

Chan Y.Y., Jayaprakasan K., Zamora J., Et al., The prevalence of congenital uterine anomalies in unselected and high-risk populations: a systematic review, Hum Reprod Update, 17, pp. 761-771, (2011)

[6]

Grimbizis G.F., Gordts G., Di Spiezio S.A., Et al., The ESHRE/ESGE consensus on the classification of female genital tract congenital malformations, Hum Reprod, 28, pp. 2032-2044, (2013)

[7]

Grimbizis G.F., Gordts S., Di Spiezio Sardo A., Et al., The ESHRE-ESGE consensus on the classification of female genital tract congenital anomalies, Gynecol Surg, 10, pp. 199-212, (2013)

[8]

Breech L.L., Laufer M.R., Mullerian anomalies, Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am, 36, pp. 47-68, (2009)

[9]

Bocca S., Abuhamad A., Use of 3-dimensional sonography to assess uterine anomalies, J Ultrasound Med, 32, pp. 1-6, (2013)

[10]

Berger A., Batzer F., Lev-Toaff A., Et al., Diagnostic imaging modalities for mullerian anomalies: the case for a new gold standard, J Minim Invasive Gynecol, 21, pp. 335-345, (2014)

← 1 2 3 →