Early Voting Changes and Voter Turnout: North Carolina in the 2016 General Election

被引:0
作者
Hannah L. Walker
Michael C. Herron
Daniel A. Smith
机构
[1] Rutgers University,Department of Political Science
[2] Hertie School of Governance,undefined
[3] Dartmouth College,undefined
[4] University of Florida,undefined
来源
Political Behavior | 2019年 / 41卷
关键词
Elections; American politics; Voting; Political behavior; Election reform; Racial and ethnic politics;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
North Carolina offers its residents the opportunity to cast early in-person (EIP) ballots prior to Election Day, a practice known locally as “One-Stop” voting. Following a successful legal challenge to the state’s controversial 2013 Voter Information and Verification Act, North Carolina’s 100 counties were given wide discretion over the hours and locations of EIP voting for the 2016 General Election. This discretion yielded a patchwork of election practices across the state, providing us with a set of natural experiments to study the effect of changes in early voting hours on voter turnout. Drawing on individual-level voting records from the North Carolina State Board of Elections, our research design matches voters on race, party, and geography. We find little evidence that changes to early opportunities in North Carolina had uniform effects on voter turnout. Nonetheless, we do identify areas in the presidential battleground state where voters appear to have reacted to local changes in early voting availability, albeit not always in directions consistent with the existing literature. We suspect that effects of changes to early voting rules are conditional on local conditions, and future research on the effects of election law changes on turnout should explore these conditions in detail.
引用
收藏
页码:841 / 869
页数:28
相关论文
共 61 条
[1]  
Amos B(2017)Reprecincting and voting behavior Political Behavior 39 133-156
[2]  
Smith DA(2013)Jim crow 2.0? Why states consider and adopt restrictive voter access policies Perspectives on Politics 11 1088-1116
[3]  
Claire CS(2005)The perverse consequences of electoral reform in the United States American Politics Research 33 471-491
[4]  
Bentele KG(2012)The limited effects of election reforms on efficacy and engagement Australian Journal of Political Science 47 55-70
[5]  
O’brien EE(2014)Election laws, mobilization, and turnout: The unanticipated consequences of election reform American Journal of Political Science 58 95-109
[6]  
Berinsky AJ(2015)Presidential commission on election administration: Absentee and early voting: Weighing the costs of convenience Election Law Journal 14 32-37
[7]  
Bowler S(2009)Modeling problems in the voter identification—voter turnout debate Election Law Journal 8 85-101
[8]  
Donovan T(2010)Reducing the costs of participation: Are states getting a return on early voting? Political Research Quarterly 63 295-303
[9]  
Burden BC(2008)Convenience voting Annual Review of Political Science 11 437-455
[10]  
Canon DT(2017)Voter identification laws and the suppression of minority votes The Journal of Politics 79 363-379