Glutathione S-transferase genotype GSTM1 as a predictor of elevated angiogenic phenotype in patients with early onset breast cancer

被引:25
作者
Medeiros R. [1 ,2 ]
Soares R. [2 ]
Vasconcelos A. [2 ]
Schmitt F. [2 ]
Lopes C. [2 ]
机构
[1] Molec. Oncol. U. - Dept. of Pathol., Inst. Português de Oncologia, R. Dr. Ant. Bernardino A.
[2] Molec. Oncol. U. - Dept. of Pathol., Inst. Português de Oncologia, Porto
[3] Molec. Oncol. U. - Dept. of Pathol., Inst. Português de Oncologia, Porto, Portugal
[4] Inst. Molec. Pathol. Immunol. Porto, Porto, Portugal
关键词
angiogenesis; breast cancer; genotypes; glutathione; GST; pharmacogenomic;
D O I
10.1023/B:AGEN.0000037330.20121.d8
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The genes coding for separate isoforms of both the human glutathione-S-transferase class (GST) mu and class theta enzymes (GSTM1 and GSTT1) are polymorphic with a percentage of normal individuals exhibiting a homozygous deletion of the genes. An association between glutathione, proliferation and tumour angiogenesis has been observed. The aim of the present study was to analyse GST polymorphisms and to determine its correlation with the angiogenesis status of the tumoral tissue of patients with breast cancer. For each case, immunohistochemistry of tumour tissue and DNA genotyping by PCR on genomic DNA isolated from blood cells were performed. The mean intratumoral microvessel density (MVD index) was higher for the cases with GSTM1 wild-type genotype in comparison with the cases with the GSTM1-null genotype (89.6 ± 10.0 vs. 60.9 ± 6.7; P = 0.022). This was even more evident for women with a breast cancer onset before the age of 35 (106.9 ± 11.9 vs. 61.8 ± 9.8; P=0.011). Multivariate logistic regression analysis of GSTM1 and GSTT1 genotypes, histologic grade, axillary node status and age at diagnosis demonstrate the independent association between GSTM1 genotypes and angiogenesis and the association of GSTM1-wild type genotype with high MVD index (adjusted OR = 5.98, 95% CI 1.28-28.10, P = 0.023). A role of this enzyme in the hypoxia-induced metabolic pathway can be a connection for its association with angiogenesis. Further studies on the enzymatic components of the glutathione biosynthetic pathway in other cancers could define a pharmacogenomic profile of human neoplasia and help identify targets for the development of therapeutic strategies.
引用
收藏
页码:53 / 58
页数:5
相关论文
共 45 条
[1]  
Folkman J., What is the evidence that tumours are angiogenesis dependent?, J Natl Cancer Inst, 82, pp. 4-6, (1990)
[2]  
Marson L.P., Miller W.R., Dixon J.M., Angiogenesis and Breast Cancer, Breast, 7, pp. 299-307, (1998)
[3]  
Hanahan D., Folkman J., Patterns and emerging mechanisms of the angiogenic switch during tumorigenesis, Cell, 86, pp. 353-364, (1996)
[4]  
Folkman J., Seminars in Medicine of the Beth Israel Hospital, Boston. Clinical Applications of research on angiogenesis, N Engl J Med, 333, pp. 1757-1763, (1995)
[5]  
Mallery S.R., Lantry L.E., Laufman H.B., Et al., Modulation of human microvascular endothelial cell bioenergetic status and glutathione levels during proliferative and differentiated growth, J Cell Biochem, 53, pp. 360-372, (1993)
[6]  
Schwartz J.L., Shklar G., Glutathione inhibits experimental oral carcinogenesis, p53 expression, and angiogenesis, Nutr Cancer, 26, pp. 229-231, (1996)
[7]  
Chen C., Liu Q., Relling M.V., Simultaneous characterization of glutathione S-transferase M1 and T1 polymorphisms by polymerase chain reaction in American whites and blacks, Pharmacogenetics, 6, pp. 187-190, (1996)
[8]  
Bell D., Taylor J., Paulson D., Et al., Genetic risk and carcinogenic exposure: A common inherited defect of the carcinogen-metabolism gene glutathione S-transferase M1 (GSTM1) that increase susceptibility to bladder cancer, J Natl Cancer Inst, 85, pp. 1159-1163, (1996)
[9]  
Marinho A., Soares R., Ferro J., Et al., Angiogenesis in breast cancer is related to age but not to other prognostic parameters, Path Res Pract, 193, pp. 267-273, (1997)
[10]  
Miliaras D., Kamas A., Kalekou H., Angiogenesis in invasive breast carcinoma: Is it associated with parameters of prognostic significance?, Histopathology, 26, pp. 165-169, (1995)