Empirical study on influence of university-industry collaboration on research performance and moderating effect of social capital: evidence from engineering academics in China

被引:0
作者
Ben Zhang
Xiaohong Wang
机构
[1] Harbin Institute of Technology,
来源
Scientometrics | 2017年 / 113卷
关键词
University-industry collaboration; Research performance; Social capital; Network ties; Tie strength;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The influence of university-industry collaboration on research performance and the moderating effect of social capital were empirically examined using a dataset of 804 engineering academics of Harbin institute of technology, with social capital in terms of network ties and tie strength. It was found that the intensity of university-industry collaboration had a negative effect on academics’ research performance (h-index), and tie strength had its positive moderation effect, which did not support the moderation effect of network ties. It is therefore concluded that university administrators should not make policies to encourage researchers to seek collaborations with industry without due consideration of research performance, while researchers with high strength of relationships should be encouraged to participate in university-industry collaboration.
引用
收藏
页码:257 / 277
页数:20
相关论文
共 178 条
[1]  
Abbasi A(2011)Identifying the effects of co-authorship networks on the performance of scholars: A correlation and regression analysis of performance measures and social network analysis measures Journal of Informetrics 5 594-607
[2]  
Altmann J(2007)Managerial social capital, strategic orientation, and organizational performance in an emerging economy Strategic Management Journal 28 1235-1255
[3]  
Hossain L(2002)Social capital: Prospects for a new concept Academy of Management Review 27 17-40
[4]  
Acquaah M(2016)University–industry relations and research group production: Is there a bidirectional relationship? Industrial and Corporate Change 25 611-632
[5]  
Adler PS(2009)h-Index: A review focused in its variants, computation and standardization for different scientific fields Journal of Informetrics 3 273-289
[6]  
Kwon SW(2015)The social network side of individual innovation: A meta-analysis and path-analytic integration Organizational Psychology Review 5 493-508
[7]  
Aguiardíaz I(2015)The double-edged sword of industry collaboration: Evidence from engineering academics in the UK Research Policy 44 1160-1175
[8]  
Díazdíaz NL(2006)Is it possible to compare researchers with different scientific interests? Scientometrics 68 179-189
[9]  
Ballesterosrodríguez JL(1996)Participation of life-science faculty in research relationships with industry New England Journal of Medicine 335 1734-1739
[10]  
Sáapérez PD(1997)Academic-industry research relationships in genetics: A field apart Nature Genetics 16 104-108