Doping Prevalence among US Elite Athletes Subject to Drug Testing under the World Anti-Doping Code

被引:5
作者
Davoren, Ann Kearns [1 ]
Rulison, Kelly [1 ]
Milroy, Jeff [2 ]
Grist, Pauline [2 ]
Fedoruk, Matthew [3 ]
Lewis, Laura [3 ]
Wyrick, David [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Prevent Strategies, Greensboro, NC 27412 USA
[2] Univ North Carolina Greensboro, Greensboro, NC USA
[3] US Antidoping Agcy USADA, Colorado Springs, CO USA
关键词
Doping prevalence; Performance enhancing drugs; Athletes; RANDOMIZED-RESPONSE; SENSITIVE QUESTIONS;
D O I
10.1186/s40798-024-00721-9
中图分类号
G8 [体育];
学科分类号
04 ; 0403 ;
摘要
Background Determining the prevalence of doping within an elite athlete population is challenging due to the extreme sensitivity of the topic; however, understanding true doping prevalence is important when designing anti-doping programs and measuring their effectiveness. The objective of this study was to estimate the prevalence of doping among Olympic, Paralympic, World, and National-level competitive athletes in the United States subject to the World Anti-Doping Code. All athletes who were subject to the U.S. Anti-Doping Agency's Protocol for Olympic and Paralympic Movement Testing, a World Anti-Doping Code ("Code")-compliant anti-doping program, were invited to complete a web-delivered survey. Using a direct questioning approach, the survey items asked athletes whether they had used each specific category of banned substance / method on the World Anti-Doping Agency's Prohibited List. Multiple strategies to encourage honest reporting (e.g., protecting anonymity by collecting minimal demographic information; using an outside organization to administer the survey) and to detect inconsistent responses were used.Results Depending on the method of calculation, 6.5-9.2% of the 1,398 respondents reported using one or more prohibited substances or methods in the 12 months prior to survey administration. Specific doping prevalence rates for each individual substance / method categories ranged from 0.1% (for both diuretics / masking agents and stem cell / gene editing) to 4.2% for in-competition use of cannabinoids.Conclusion Determining the prevalence of doping within different athlete populations is critical so that sport governing bodies can evaluate their anti-doping efforts and better tailor their programming. By measuring doping prevalence of specific categories of substances and methods, rather than just the overall prevalence of doping, this study also highlights where sport governing bodies should focus their future educational and detection efforts. Estimated doping prevalence among U.S. elite athletes ranged from 6.5 to 9.2%.The most prevalent category of doping was in-competition use of cannabinoids (at 4.2%), whereas the least prevalent categories of doping were diuretics or masking agents (0.1%), stem cell or gene editing (0.1%), narcotics (0.2%), and hormone and metabolic modulators (0.2%).Of the athletes who reported doping, most reported using only one substance or method.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2019, The World Anti-Doping Code International Standard
[2]   Predictors of doping intentions, susceptibility, and behaviour of elite athletes: a meta-analytic review [J].
Blank, Cornelia ;
Kopp, Martin ;
Niedermeier, Martin ;
Schnitzer, Martin ;
Schobersberger, Wolfgang .
SPRINGERPLUS, 2016, 5
[3]  
Bowers LD, 2017, SPORT ETHICS PHILOS, V11, P132, DOI 10.1080/17511321.2016.1261930
[4]   Medicine and science in the fight against doping in sport [J].
Catlin, D. H. ;
Fitch, K. D. ;
Ljungqvist, A. .
JOURNAL OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2008, 264 (02) :99-114
[5]   Prevalence of Doping Use in Elite Sports: A Review of Numbers and Methods [J].
de Hon, Olivier ;
Kuipers, Harm ;
van Bottenburg, Maarten .
SPORTS MEDICINE, 2015, 45 (01) :57-69
[6]  
Elbe AM, 2018, PERFORM ENHANC HLTH, V6, P28, DOI [10.1016/j.peh.2018.01.001, 10.1016/j.peh.2018.01.001, DOI 10.1016/J.PEH.2018.01.001]
[7]   From Gene Engineering to Gene Modulation and Manipulation: Can We Prevent or Detect Gene Doping in Sports? [J].
Fischetto, Giuseppe ;
Bermon, Stephane .
SPORTS MEDICINE, 2013, 43 (10) :965-977
[8]   Doping Prevalence in Competitive Sport: Evidence Synthesis with "Best Practice" Recommendations and Reporting Guidelines from the WADA Working Group on Doping Prevalence [J].
Gleaves, John ;
Petroczi, Andrea ;
Folkerts, Dirk ;
de Hon, Olivier ;
Macedo, Emmanuel ;
Saugy, Martial ;
Cruyff, Maarten .
SPORTS MEDICINE, 2021, 51 (09) :1909-1934
[9]   Sensitive Questions in Online Surveys: An Experimental Evaluation of Different Implementations of the Randomized Response Technique and the Crosswise Model [J].
Hoglinger, Marc ;
Jann, Ben ;
Diekmann, Andreas .
SURVEY RESEARCH METHODS, 2016, 10 (03) :171-187
[10]   What the lab can and cannot do: clinical interpretation of drug testing results [J].
Kapur, Bhushan M. ;
Aleksa, Katarina .
CRITICAL REVIEWS IN CLINICAL LABORATORY SCIENCES, 2020, 57 (08) :548-585