Long-term follow-up of patients with diffuse large B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma receiving purged autografts after induction failure

被引:0
作者
J E Benjamin
G L Chen
T M Cao
P D Cao
R M Wong
K Sheehan
J A Shizuru
L J Johnston
R S Negrin
R Lowsky
G G Laport
机构
[1] Stanford University,Division of Blood and Marrow Transplantation
来源
Bone Marrow Transplantation | 2010年 / 45卷
关键词
lymphoma; large B-cell; diffuse; autologous transplantation;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) who do not achieve a complete response to front-line combination chemotherapy are often offered high-dose therapy and autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation (AHCT). However, the efficacy of this therapy in this patient population has been addressed in only a few published reports. We retrospectively analyzed the outcomes of patients with a diagnosis of de novo DLBCL who underwent AHCT at our center between 1988 and 2002, and identified 43 consecutive patients who had not achieved a CR before AHCT, although most showed at least a partial response (PR) to either induction or subsequent salvage chemotherapy. A total of 15 patients received a conditioning regimen that included high-dose chemotherapy with fractionated TBI (FTBI), whereas 28 patients received high-dose chemotherapy only. All autografts were treated ex vivo with MoAbs and complement in an effort to remove any residual malignant B cells. A total of 33 (77%) patients achieved a CR after AHCT. With a median follow-up of 7.3 years, the 5-year OS was 69% and EFS was 59%. Four patients died from non-relapse mortality. By univariate analyses, the following characteristics did not significantly impact OS: disease stage at diagnosis, age-adjusted IPI (International Prognostic Index) score, age ⩾40 years, earlier radiotherapy and the use of FTBI in the conditioning regimen. These results confirm the long-term efficacy of AHCT for patients with DLBCL after induction failure.
引用
收藏
页码:303 / 309
页数:6
相关论文
共 145 条
  • [1] Fisher RI(1993)Comparison of a standard regimen (CHOP) with three intensive chemotherapy regimens for advanced non-Hodgkin's lymphoma N Engl J Med 328 1002-1006
  • [2] Gaynor ER(2002)CHOP chemotherapy plus rituximab compared with CHOP alone in elderly patients with diffuse large-B-cell lymphoma N Engl J Med 346 235-242
  • [3] Dahlberg S(2006)CHOP-like chemotherapy plus rituximab versus CHOP-like chemotherapy alone in young patients with good-prognosis diffuse large-B-cell lymphoma: a randomised controlled trial by the MabThera International Trial (MInT) Group Lancet Oncol 7 379-391
  • [4] Oken MM(2000)High-dose chemoradiotherapy and autologous stem cell transplantation for patients with primary refractory aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphoma: an intention-to-treat analysis Blood 96 2399-2404
  • [5] Grogan TM(1995)Autologous bone marrow transplantation as compared with salvage chemotherapy in relapses of chemotherapy-sensitive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma N Engl J Med 333 1540-1545
  • [6] Mize EM(1988)High-dose therapy and autologous bone marrow transplantation in partial remission after first-line induction therapy for diffuse non-Hodgkin's lymphoma J Clin Oncol 6 1118-1124
  • [7] Coiffier B(1992)Salvage therapy with ProMACE-MOPP followed by intensive chemoradiotherapy and autologous bone marrow transplantation for patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma who failed to respond to first-line CHOP J Clin Oncol 10 1949-1954
  • [8] Lepage E(1996)High-dose chemotherapy followed by autologous bone marrow transplantation versus dexamethasone, cisplatin, and cytarabine in aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma with partial response to front-line chemotherapy: a prospective randomized Italian multicenter study J Clin Oncol 14 534-542
  • [9] Briere J(1996)Intensive therapy and autotransplant for patients with an incomplete response to front-line therapy for lymphoma Ann Oncol 7 1043-1049
  • [10] Herbrecht R(1996)Outcome of high-dose therapy and autologous transplantation in non-Hodgkin's lymphoma based on the presence of tumor in the marrow or infused hematopoietic harvest J Clin Oncol 14 214-219