Agroforestry and Biodiversity Conservation – Traditional Practices, Present Dynamics, and Lessons for the Future

被引:0
|
作者
Jeffrey A. McNeely
Götz Schroth
机构
[1] Chief Scientist,Sustainable Landscapes Program
[2] IUCN – The World Conservation Union,undefined
[3] Conservation International,undefined
来源
Biodiversity & Conservation | 2006年 / 15卷
关键词
Conservation of wild biodiversity; Convention on Biological Diversity; Environmental service; Land use change; Natural resource management; Policy framework; Traditional agroforestry practice;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The environmental services that agroforestry practices can provide, and especially their potential contribution to the conservation of biodiversity, have only recently attracted wider attention among agroforestry and conservation scientists. This new view is consistent with the ecosystem approach to natural resource management advocated by the Convention on Biological Diversity. This collection of six papers, which is based on a Workshop held in June–July 2004, brings together studies of biodiversity impacts of traditional agroforestry practices from Central and South America, Africa and Asia. The contributions highlight the considerable potential of traditional agroforestry practices to support biodiversity conservation, but also show their limits. These include the importance of sufficient areas of natural habitat and of appropriate hunting regulations for maintaining high levels of biodiversity in agroforestry land use mosaics, as well as the critical role of markets for tree products and of a favourable policy environment for agroforestry land uses. In combination the case studies suggest that maintaining diversity in approaches to management of agroforestry systems, along with a pragmatic, undogmatic view on natural resource management, will provide the widest range of options for adapting to changing land use conditions.
引用
收藏
页码:549 / 554
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Agroforestry and biodiversity conservation - traditional practices, present dynamics, and lessons for the future
    McNeely, JA
    Schroth, G
    BIODIVERSITY AND CONSERVATION, 2006, 15 (02) : 549 - 554
  • [2] Diversity of Traditional Agroforestry Practices of Sarguja: Implications for Biodiversity Conservation
    Rathia, V. K.
    Jhariya, M. K.
    Yadav, D. K.
    Banerjee, A.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ECOLOGY & DEVELOPMENT, 2019, 34 (01) : 43 - 60
  • [3] TRADITIONAL AGROFORESTRY SYSTEMS AND BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION
    Doddabasawa
    Chittapur, B. M.
    Murthy, M. Mahadeva
    BANGLADESH JOURNAL OF BOTANY, 2018, 47 (04): : 927 - 935
  • [4] Traditional Conservation Practices, Biodiversity Conservation and Ecosystems
    Gokhale, Yogesh
    ASIAN BIOTECHNOLOGY AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW, 2010, 12 (03): : 35 - 47
  • [5] Traditional agroforestry systems and biodiversity conservation in Benin (West Africa)
    Vodouhe G. Fifanou
    Coulibaly Ousmane
    Biaou Gauthier
    Sinsin Brice
    Agroforestry Systems, 2011, 82 : 1 - 13
  • [6] Traditional agroforestry systems and biodiversity conservation in Benin (West Africa)
    Fifanou, Vodouhe G.
    Ousmane, Coulibaly
    Gauthier, Biaou
    Brice, Sinsin
    AGROFORESTRY SYSTEMS, 2011, 82 (01) : 1 - 13
  • [7] Agroforestry and Biodiversity Conservation in Tropical Landscapes
    Amin, Jagdish V.
    ENVIRONMENTAL PRACTICE, 2006, 8 (03) : 194 - +
  • [8] TRADITIONAL AGROFORESTRY PRACTICES IN ZIMBABWE
    CAMPBELL, BM
    CLARKE, JM
    GUMBO, DJ
    AGROFORESTRY SYSTEMS, 1991, 14 (02) : 99 - 111
  • [9] INDONESIAN AGROFORESTRY PRACTICES - A TRADITIONAL CONTRIBUTION TO THE CONSERVATION OF RAIN-FOREST RESOURCES
    MICHON, G
    BOMPARD, JM
    REVUE D ECOLOGIE-LA TERRE ET LA VIE, 1987, 42 (01): : 3 - +
  • [10] Biodiversity conservation planning tools: Present status and challenges for the future
    Sarkar, Sahotra
    Pressey, Robert L.
    Faith, Daniel P.
    Margules, Christopher R.
    Fuller, Trevon
    Stoms, David M.
    Moffett, Alexander
    Wilson, Kerrie A.
    Williams, Kristen J.
    Williams, Paul H.
    Andelman, Sandy
    ANNUAL REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENT AND RESOURCES, 2006, 31 : 123 - 159