Influence of metallic dental implants and metal artefacts on dose calculation accuracy; [Einfluss von metallischen Zahnimplantaten und Metallartefakten auf die Genauigkeit der Dosisberechnung]

被引:0
作者
Maerz M. [1 ]
Koelbl O. [1 ]
Dobler B. [1 ]
机构
[1] Department of Radiotherapy, Regensburg University Medical Center, Regensburg
关键词
Computed tomography; Dental implants; GafChromic; Intensity modulated radiation therapy; Metal artifacts; Radiotherapy;
D O I
10.1007/s00066-014-0774-2
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Purpose: Metallic dental implants cause severe streaking artefacts in computed tomography (CT) data, which inhibit the correct representation of shape and density of the metal and the surrounding tissue. The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of dental implants on the accuracy of dose calculations in radiation therapy planning and the benefit of metal artefact reduction (MAR). A second aim was to determine the treatment technique which is less sensitive to the presence of metallic implants in terms of dose calculation accuracy. Materials and methods: Phantoms consisting of homogeneous water equivalent material surrounding dental implants were designed. Artefact-containing CT data were corrected using the correct density information. Intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) plans were calculated on corrected and uncorrected CT data and compared to 2-dimensional dose measurements using GafChromic™ EBT2 films. Results: For all plans the accuracy of dose calculations is significantly higher if performed on corrected CT data (p = 0.015). The agreement of calculated and measured dose distributions is significantly higher for VMAT than for IMRT plans for calculations on uncorrected CT data (p = 0.011) as well as on corrected CT data (p = 0.029). Conclusion: For IMRT and VMAT the application of metal artefact reduction significantly increases the agreement of dose calculations with film measurements. VMAT was found to provide the highest accuracy on corrected as well as on uncorrected CT data. VMAT is therefore preferable over IMRT for patients with metallic implants, if plan quality is comparable for the two techniques. © 2014, Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg.
引用
收藏
页码:234 / 241
页数:7
相关论文
共 39 条
[1]  
Yazdi M., Lari M.A., Bernier G., Et al., An opposite view data replacement approach for reducing artifacts due to metallic dental objects, Med Phys, 38, pp. 2275-2281, (2011)
[2]  
Bazalova M., Beaulieu L., Palefsky S., Et al., Correction of CT artifacts and its influence on Monte Carlo dose calculations, Med Phys, 34, pp. 2119-2132, (2007)
[3]  
Kim Y., Tome W.A., Bal M., Et al., The impact of dental metal artifacts on head and neck IMRT dose distributions, Radiother Oncol, 79, pp. 198-202, (2006)
[4]  
Roberts R., How accurate is a CT-based dose calculation on a pencil beam TPS for a patient with a metallic prosthesis?, Phys Med Biol, 46, pp. 227-234, (2001)
[5]  
Wei J., Sandison G.A., Hsi W.-C., Et al., Dosimetric impact of a CT metal artefact suppression algorithm for proton, electron and photon therapies, Phys Med Biol, 51, pp. 5183-5197, (2006)
[6]  
Mail N., Albarakati Y., Ahmad Khan M., Et al., The impacts of dental filling materials on RapidArc treatment planning and dose delivery: challenges and solution, Med Phys, 40, (2013)
[7]  
Spadea M.F., Verburg J., Baroni G., Et al., Dosimetric assessment of a novel metal artifact reduction method in CT images, J Appl Clin Med Phys, 14, (2013)
[8]  
Spadea M.F., Verburg J.M., Baroni G., Et al., The impact of low-Z and high-Z metal implants in IMRT: a Monte Carlo study of dose inaccuracies in commercial dose algorithms, Med Phys, 41, (2014)
[9]  
Paudel M.R., Mackenzie M., Fallone B.G., Et al., Evaluation of normalized metal artifact reduction (NMAR) in kVCT using MVCT prior images for radiotherapy treatment planning, Med Phys, 40, (2013)
[10]  
Paudel M.R., Mackenzie M., Fallone B.G., Et al., Clinical evaluation of normalized metal artifact reduction in kVCT using MVCT prior images (MVCT-NMAR) for radiation therapy treatment planning, Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 89, pp. 682-689, (2014)