Emergency care capacity in Freetown, Sierra Leone: A service evaluation

被引:28
作者
Coyle R.M. [1 ,2 ]
Harrison H.-L. [2 ]
机构
[1] Department of Primary Care and Public Health, King's College, London, England
[2] King's Sierra Leone Partnership, King's Centre for Global Health, Weston Education Centre, London, England
关键词
Emergency medical systems; Emergency medicine; Low-income country;
D O I
10.1186/s12873-015-0027-4
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Background: There is an increasing global recognition of the role of emergency medical services in improving population health. Emergency medical services remain underdeveloped in many low income countries, particularly in sub-Saharan Africa. There have been no previous evaluations of specialist emergency and critical care services in Sierra Leone. Methods: Emergency care capacity was evaluated at a sample of seven public and private hospitals in Freetown, the capital of Sierra Leone. A structured set of minimum standards necessary to deliver emergency and critical care in the low-income setting was used to evaluate capacity. The key dimensions of capacity evaluated were infrastructure, human resources, drug and equipment availability, training, systems, guidelines and diagnostics. A score for each dimension of capacity was calculated based on the availability of a list of specified indicators within each dimension. In addition, an Emergency Care Capacity Score was calculated to demonstrate a composite measure of capacity based on the various indicator scores. This method has been used by the World Health Organisation in evaluating the availability and readiness of healthcare systems in low- and middle-income countries. Results: Substantial deficiencies in capacity were demonstrated across the range of indicators and predominantly affecting publically funded facilities. Capacity was weakest in the domain of infrastructure, with an average score of 43%, while the strongest areas of capacity overall were in drug availability, 82%, and human resources, 79%. A marked disparity was noted between public and private healthcare facilities with consistently lower capacity in the former. The overall Emergency Care Capacity Score was 66%. Conclusion: There are substantial deficiencies in emergency care systems in public hospitals in Freetown which are likely to compromise effective care. This represents a serious barrier to access to emergency healthcare. Emergency care systems have an important role in improving population health and as such should a priority for local policy makers. © 2015 Coyle and Harrison.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]  
Anderson P.D., Suter R.E., Mulligan T., Bodiwala G., Razzak J.A., Mock C., World Health Assembly Resolution 60.22 and its importance as a health care policy tool for improving emergency care access and availability globally, Ann Emerg Med, 60, 1, pp. 35-44, (2012)
[2]  
Anthony D.R., Promoting emergency medical care systems in the developing world: weighing the costs, Glob Public Health, 6, 8, pp. 906-913, (2011)
[3]  
Resolution WHA60.22. Health systems: Emergency care systems, (2007)
[4]  
VanRooyen M.J., Development of prehospital emergency medical services: strategies for system assessment and planning, Pac Health Dialog, 9, 1, pp. 86-92, (2002)
[5]  
World Development Indicators - Sierra Leone: World Bank, (2013)
[6]  
Life expectancy at birth, total (years), (2013)
[7]  
National Health Sector Strategic Plan 2010-2015, (2009)
[8]  
Kingham T.P., Kamara T.B., Cherian M.N., Gosselin R.A., Simkins M., Meissner C., Quantifying surgical capacity in Sierra Leone: a guide for improving surgical care, Arch Surg, 144, 2, pp. 122-127, (2009)
[9]  
Oyerinde K., Harding Y., Amara P., Kanu R., Shoo R., Daoh K., The status of maternal and newborn care services in Sierra Leone 8 years after ceasefire., Int J Gynaecol Obstet, 114, 2, pp. 168-173, (2011)
[10]  
Health Partnerships - Sierra Leone London King's College London, (2013)