Predictive learning as a network mechanism for extracting low-dimensional latent space representations

被引:0
作者
Stefano Recanatesi
Matthew Farrell
Guillaume Lajoie
Sophie Deneve
Mattia Rigotti
Eric Shea-Brown
机构
[1] University of Washington Center for Computational Neuroscience and Swartz Center for Theoretical Neuroscience,Department of Applied Mathematics
[2] University of Washington,Department of Mathematics and Statistics
[3] Université de Montréal,undefined
[4] Mila-Quebec Artificial Intelligence Institute,undefined
[5] Group for Neural Theory,undefined
[6] Ecole Normal Superieur,undefined
[7] IBM Research AI,undefined
[8] Allen Institute for Brain Science,undefined
来源
Nature Communications | / 12卷
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Artificial neural networks have recently achieved many successes in solving sequential processing and planning tasks. Their success is often ascribed to the emergence of the task’s low-dimensional latent structure in the network activity – i.e., in the learned neural representations. Here, we investigate the hypothesis that a means for generating representations with easily accessed low-dimensional latent structure, possibly reflecting an underlying semantic organization, is through learning to predict observations about the world. Specifically, we ask whether and when network mechanisms for sensory prediction coincide with those for extracting the underlying latent variables. Using a recurrent neural network model trained to predict a sequence of observations we show that network dynamics exhibit low-dimensional but nonlinearly transformed representations of sensory inputs that map the latent structure of the sensory environment. We quantify these results using nonlinear measures of intrinsic dimensionality and linear decodability of latent variables, and provide mathematical arguments for why such useful predictive representations emerge. We focus throughout on how our results can aid the analysis and interpretation of experimental data.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 127 条
[11]  
Song HF(2017)Predictive representations can link model-based reinforcement learning to model-free mechanisms PLoS Computat. Biol. 13 e1005768-232
[12]  
Newsome WT(2011)Predictive coding Wiley Interdiscip. Rev.: Cognit. Sci. 2 580-385
[13]  
Wang X-J(2017)A review of predictive coding algorithms Brain Cogn. 112 92-71
[14]  
Bengio Y(2017)Computational account of spontaneous activity as a signature of predictive coding PLoS Computat. Biol. 13 e1005355-41
[15]  
Ducharme R(2014)Build, compute, critique, repeat: data analysis with latent variable models Ann. Rev. Stat. Appl. 1 203-6913
[16]  
Vincent P(2015)Learning deep generative models Ann. Rev. Stat. Appl. 2 361-191
[17]  
Jauvin C(2018)A review of dynamic network models with latent variables Stat. Surv. 12 105-210
[18]  
Collobert R(2009)Dimensionality reduction: a comparative J. Mach. Learn. Res. 10 66-175
[19]  
Dayan P(2013)The importance of mixed selectivity in complex cognitive tasks Nature 497 585-138
[20]  
Russek EM(2017)Optimal degrees of synaptic connectivity Neuron 93 1153–1164.e7-770