The Anal Fistula Plug versus the mucosal advancement flap for the treatment of Anorectal Fistula (PLUG trial)

被引:28
|
作者
Van Koperen P.J. [1 ]
Bemelman W.A. [1 ]
Bossuyt P.M.M. [2 ]
Gerhards M.F. [3 ]
Eijsbouts Q.A.J. [4 ]
Van Tets W.F. [5 ]
Janssen L.W.M. [6 ]
Dijkstra F.R. [6 ]
Van Dalsen A.D. [7 ]
Slors J.F.M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Department of Surgery, Academic Medical Centre, Amsterdam
[2] Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Bio-statistics, Academic Medical Centre, Amsterdam
[3] Department of Surgery, Onze Lieve Vrouwe Gasthuis, Amsterdam
[4] Department of Surgery, Spaarne Hospital, Heemstede
[5] Department of Surgery, Sint Lucas Andreas Hospital, Amsterdam
[6] Department of Surgery, Zuwe Hofpoort Hospital, Woerden
[7] Department of Surgery, Isala Clinics, Zwolle
关键词
Fibrin Glue; Fistula Tract; Internal Opening; Advancement Flap; Perianal Fistula;
D O I
10.1186/1471-2482-8-11
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Background. Low transsphincteric fistulas less than 1/3 of the sphincter complex are easy to treat by fistulotomy with a high success rate. High transsphincteric fistulas remain a surgical challenge. Various surgical procedures are available, but recurrence rates of these techniques are disappointingly high. The mucosal flap advancement is considered the gold standard for the treatment of high perianal fistula of cryptoglandular origin by most colorectal surgeons. In the literature a recurrence rate between 0 and 63% is reported for the mucosal flap advancement. Recently Armstrong and colleagues reported on a new biologic anal fistula plug, a bioabsorbable xenograft made of lyophilized porcine intestinal submucosa. Their prospective series of 15 patients with high perianal fistula treated with the anal fistula plug showed promising results. The anal fistula plug trial is designed to compare the anal fistula plug with the mucosal flap advancement in the treatment of high perianal fistula in terms of success rate, continence, postoperative pain, and quality of life. Methods/design. The PLUG trial is a randomized controlled multicenter trial. Sixty patients with high perianal fistulas of cryptoglandular origin will be randomized to either the fistula plug or the mucosal advancement flap. Study parameters will be anorectal fistula closure-rate, continence, post-operative pain, and quality of life. Patients will be followed-up at two weeks, four weeks, and 16 weeks. At the final follow-up closure rate is determined by clinical examination by a surgeon blinded for the intervention. Discussion. Before broadly implementing the anal fistula plug results of randomized trials using the plug should be awaited. This randomized controlled trial comparing the anal fistula plug and the mucosal advancement flap should provide evidence regarding the effectiveness of the anal fistula plug in the treatment of high perianal fistulas. Trial registration. ISRCTN: 97376902. © 2008 van Koperen et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Randomized clinical Trial of Anal Fistula Plug versus endorectal Advancement Flap for the Treatment of high cryptoglandular Fistula in Ano
    Weimann, D.
    COLOPROCTOLOGY, 2010, 32 (05) : 292 - 293
  • [2] Randomized clinical trial of anal fistula plug versus endorectal advancement flap for the treatment of high cryptoglandular fistula in ano
    Ortiz, H.
    Marzo, J.
    Ciga, M. A.
    Oteiza, F.
    Armendariz, P.
    de Miguel, M.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2009, 96 (06) : 608 - 612
  • [3] The Anal Fistula Plug Treatment Compared With the Mucosal Advancement Flap for Cryptoglandular High Transsphincteric Perianal Fistula: A Double-Blinded Multicenter Randomized Trial
    van Koperen, Paul J.
    Bemelman, Willem A.
    Gerhards, Michael F.
    Janssen, Lucas W. M.
    van Tets, Willem F.
    van Dalsen, Annette D.
    Slors, J. Frederik M.
    DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2011, 54 (04) : 387 - 393
  • [4] Complex anal fistula: plug or flap?
    Muhlmann, M.
    Hayes, J.
    Merrie, A.
    Parry, B.
    Bisset, I.
    JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2009, 24 : A242 - A243
  • [5] Treatment of transsphincteric anal fistulas by endorectal advancement flap or anal fistula plug: A comparative study
    Christoforidis, D.
    Pieh, M.
    Goldberg, S.
    Madoff, R.
    Mellgren, A.
    DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2008, 51 (05) : 638 - 638
  • [6] OUTCOMES OF RECTOVAGINAL FISTULA SURGERY: RECTOVAGINAL FISTULA PLUG VERSUS FLAP ADVANCEMENT
    Chung, W.
    Ko, D.
    Sun, C.
    Phang, T.
    JOURNAL OF INVESTIGATIVE MEDICINE, 2009, 57 (01) : 148 - 148
  • [7] Anal fistula plug for closure of difficult anorectal fistula: A prospective study
    van Koperen, Paul J.
    D'Hoore, Andre
    Wolthuis, Albert M.
    Bemelman, Willem A.
    Slors, J. Frederik M.
    DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2007, 50 (12) : 2168 - 2172
  • [8] Anal Fistula Plug for Closure of Difficult Anorectal Fistula: a Prospective Study
    van Koperen, Paul J.
    D'Hoore, Andre
    Wolthuis, Albert M.
    Bemelman, Willem A.
    Slors, J. Frederik M.
    COLOPROCTOLOGY, 2008, 30 (03) : 159 - 164
  • [9] Treatment of Transsphincteric Anal Fistulas by Endorectal Advancement Flap or Collagen Fistula Plug: A Comparative Study
    Christoforidis, Dimitrios
    Pieh, Matthew C.
    Madoff, Robert D.
    Mellgren, Anders F.
    DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2009, 52 (01) : 18 - 22
  • [10] Efficacy of the anal fistula plug in complex anorectal fistulae
    Thekkinkattil, D. K.
    Botterill, I.
    Ambrose, N. S.
    Lundby, L.
    Sagar, P. M.
    Buntzen, S.
    Finan, P. J.
    COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2009, 11 (06) : 584 - 587