The effect of financial crises on deforestation: a global and regional panel data analysis

被引:0
作者
Alexander S. Antonarakis
Lucia Pacca
Andreas Antoniades
机构
[1] University of Sussex,School of Global Studies
[2] University of California,Center for Vulnerable Populations
来源
Sustainability Science | 2022年 / 17卷
关键词
Deforestation; Financial crises; Environmental sustainability; Panel data analysis; Deforestation drivers; Forest cover datasets;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Managing our transition to sustainability requires a solid understanding of how conditions of financial crisis affect our natural environment. Yet, there has been little focus on the nature of the relationship between financial crises and environmental sustainability, especially in relation to forests and deforestation. This study addressed this gap by providing novel evidence on the impact of financial crises on deforestation. A panel data approach is used looking at Global Forest Watch deforestation data from > 150 countries in > 100 crises in the twenty-first century. This includes an analysis of crises effects on principle drivers of deforestation; timber and agricultural commodities—palm oil, soybean, coffee, cattle, and cocoa. At a global level, financial crises are associated with a reduction in deforestation rates (− 36 p.p) and deforestation drivers; roundwood (− 6.7 p.p.), cattle (− 2.3 p.p.) and cocoa production (− 8.3 p.p.). Regionally, deforestation rates in Asia, Africa, and Europe decreased by − 83, − 43, and 22 p.p, respectively. Drivers behind these effects may be different, from palm oil (− 1.3 p.p.) and cocoa (− 10.5 p.p.) reductions in Africa, to a combination of timber (− 9.5 p.p) and palm oil in Asia. Moreover, financial crises have a larger effect on deforestation in low-income, than upper middle- and high-income countries (− 51 vs − 39 and − 18 p.p. respectively). Using another main dataset on yearly forest cover—the ESA-Climate Change Initiative—a picture arises showing financial crises leading to small global decreases in forest cover (− 0.1 p.p.) with a small agricultural cover increase (0.1 p.p). Our findings point to financial crises as important moments for global deforestation dynamics. Yet, to consolidate benefits on decreasing deforestation, governments need to enhance their sustainable forest management during crisis periods rather than let it slip down national agendas. Finally, to achieve the SDGs related to forests, better global forest cover datasets are needed, with better forest loss/gain data, disturbance history, and understanding of mosaicked landscape dynamics within a satellite pixel.
引用
收藏
页码:1037 / 1057
页数:20
相关论文
共 214 条
[21]  
Stern N(2006)Bat and bird assemblages from forests and shade cacao plantations in two contrasting landscapes in the Atlantic Forest of southern Bahia, Brazil Biodivers Conserv 15 325-853
[22]  
Burns C(2013)Amazonian forest loss and the long reach of China’s influence Environ Dev Sustain 142 597-20
[23]  
Tobin P(2009)Three decades of deforestation in southwest Sumatra: effects of coffee prices, law enforcement and rural poverty Biol Conserv 342 850-145
[24]  
Burns C(2013)High-resolution global maps of 21st-century forest cover change Science 7 044009-804
[25]  
Eckersley P(2012)An assessment of deforestation and forest degradation drivers in developing countries Environ Res Lett 18 1-3472
[26]  
Tobin P(2021)Impacts of the 2008 Great Recession on dietary intake: a systematic review and meta-analysis Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 5 144-116
[27]  
Busch J(2021)The Brazilian Amazon deforestation rate in 2020 is the greatest of the decade Nat Ecol Evol 18 791-262
[28]  
Ferretti-Gallon K(2005)Financial crisis and state–NGO relations: the case of Brazilian Amazonia, 1998–2000 Soc Nat Resour 108 3465-331
[29]  
Carr D(2011)Global land use change, economic globalization, and the looming land scarcity Proc Natl Acad Sci 8 109-144
[30]  
Cropper M(2018)The role of supply-chain initiatives in reducing deforestation Nat Clim Change 25 259-138