Two- versus three-dimensional ultrasound in the second and third trimester of pregnancy: Impact on recognition and maternal-fetal bonding. A prospective pilot study

被引：17

作者：

Lapaire O. ^{[1
]}

Alder J. ^{[1
]}

Peukert R. ^{[1
]}

Holzgreve W. ^{[1
]}

Tercanli S. ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital Basel, CH-4031 Basel

来源：

Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics | 2007年 / 276卷 / 5期

关键词：

Maternal-fetal relations; Prenatal; Prenatal care; Ultrasonography;

D O I：

10.1007/s00404-007-0368-7

中图分类号：

学科分类号：

摘要：

Objective: To assess the impact of three-dimensional (3D) versus two-dimensional (2D) ultrasound (US) on maternal-fetal bonding. Study design: Prospective randomized pilot study among low risk women with singleton fetuses in the second and third trimester. Dependent on the randomization pattern, US was commenced either with 2D US or 3D US and the effects were recorded with standardized questionnaires. Results: Sixty patients were included. Although the quality of 2D US, assessed by the examinator, was superior to 3D US, maternal recognition was higher with 3-D US (P = 0.004). With 2D US, nulliparous patients had significantly more difficulties visualizing the fetus, than multiparous (P = 0.03). However, the maternal preference of 3D US had no significant impact on maternal-fetal bonding. Conclusion: Ultrasound had no significant effect on maternal-fetal bonding. Three-dimensional images may facilitate recognition of the fetus, but 3D US did not have higher impact on maternal-fetal bonding. This finding may be a reason not to consider 3D ultrasound for routine scanning. © 2007 Springer-Verlag.

引用

页码：475 / 479

页数：4

共 16 条

[1]

Ji E.K., Pretorius D.H., Newton R., Uyan K., Hull A.D., Hollenbach K., Nelson T.R., Effects of ultrasound on maternal-fetal bonding: A comparison of two- and three dimensional imaging, Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 25, pp. 473-477, (2005)

[2]

Pretorius D.H., Uyan K.M., Newton R., Hull A., James G., Nelson T., Effects of US on maternal-fetal bonding: 2D versus 3D, Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 18, SUPPL. 1, (2001)

[3]

Cranley M.S., Development of a tool for the measurement of maternal attachment during pregnancy, Nurs Res, 30, pp. 281-284, (1981)

[4]

Timor-Tritsch I.E., Platt L.D., Three-dimensional ultrasound experiences in obstetrics, Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol, 14, pp. 569-575, (2002)

[5]

Dyson R.L., Pretorius D.H., Budorick N.E., Johnson D.D., Sklansky M.S., Cantrell C.J., Lai S., Nelson T.R., Three-dimensional ultrasound in the evaluation of fetal anomalies, Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 16, pp. 321-328, (2000)

[6]

Heidrich S.M., Cranley M.S., Effect of fetal movement, ultrasound scans, and amniocentesis on maternal-fetal attachment, Nurs Res, 38, pp. 81-84, (1988)

[7]

Siddiqui A., Hagglof B., Does maternal prenatal attachment predict postnatal mother-infant interaction?, Early Hum Dev, 59, pp. 13-25, (2000)

[8]

Pretorius D.H., Nelson T.R., Fetal face visualization using three dimensional ultrasonography, J Ultrasound Med, 14, pp. 349-356, (1995)

[9]

Nelson T.R., Elvins T.T., Visualization of 3D ultrasound data, IEEE Comput Graph Appl, 13, pp. 50-57, (1993)

[10]

Chudleigh T., Scanning for pleasure, Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 14, pp. 369-371, (1999)

← 1 2 →