Gender differences in the diagnostic accuracy of SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging: A bivariate meta-analysis

[1] Klocke FJ(2003)ACC/AHA/ASNC guidelines for the clinical use of cardiac radionuclide imaging—executive summary: A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (ACC/AHA/ASNC Committee to Revise the 1995 Guidelines for the Clinical Use of Cardiac Radionuclide Imaging) Circulation 108 1404-1418

[2] Baird MG(1996)Lower diagnostic accuracy of thallium-201 SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging in women: An effect of smaller chamber size J Am Coll Cardiol 28 1214-1219

[3] Lorell BH(2006)Insights from the NHLBI-sponsored Women’s Ischemia Syndrome Evaluation (WISE) Study: Part I: Gender differences in traditional and novel risk factors, symptom evaluation, and gender-optimized diagnostic strategies J Am Coll Cardiol 47 S4-S20

[4] Bateman TM(2008)Women with chest pain: Expanding the diagnostic armamentarium JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 1 446-449

[5] Messer JV(2010)Exercise stress testing in women: Going back to the basics Circulation 122 2570-2580

[6] Berman DS(1999)Meta-analysis of exercise testing to detect coronary artery disease in women Am J Cardiol 83 660-666

[7] Hansen CL(2009)Diagnostic test systematic reviews: Bibliographic search filters (“Clinical Queries”) for diagnostic accuracy studies perform well J Clin Epidemiol 62 974-981

[8] Crabbe D(2003)The development of QUADAS: A tool for the quality assessment of studies of diagnostic accuracy included in systematic reviews BMC Med Res Methodol 3 25-809

[9] Rubin S(1996)Adenosine technetium-99m sestamibi myocardial perfusion SPECT in women: Diagnostic efficacy in detection of coronary artery disease J Am Coll Cardiol 27 803-404

[10] Shaw LJ(2008)Superiority of exercise myocardial perfusion imaging compared with the exercise ECG in the diagnosis of coronary artery disease Coron Artery Dis 19 399-634

[1] Klocke FJ(2003)ACC/AHA/ASNC guidelines for the clinical use of cardiac radionuclide imaging—executive summary: A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (ACC/AHA/ASNC Committee to Revise the 1995 Guidelines for the Clinical Use of Cardiac Radionuclide Imaging) Circulation 108 1404-1418

[2] Baird MG(1996)Lower diagnostic accuracy of thallium-201 SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging in women: An effect of smaller chamber size J Am Coll Cardiol 28 1214-1219

[3] Lorell BH(2006)Insights from the NHLBI-sponsored Women’s Ischemia Syndrome Evaluation (WISE) Study: Part I: Gender differences in traditional and novel risk factors, symptom evaluation, and gender-optimized diagnostic strategies J Am Coll Cardiol 47 S4-S20

[4] Bateman TM(2008)Women with chest pain: Expanding the diagnostic armamentarium JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 1 446-449

[5] Messer JV(2010)Exercise stress testing in women: Going back to the basics Circulation 122 2570-2580

[6] Berman DS(1999)Meta-analysis of exercise testing to detect coronary artery disease in women Am J Cardiol 83 660-666

[7] Hansen CL(2009)Diagnostic test systematic reviews: Bibliographic search filters (“Clinical Queries”) for diagnostic accuracy studies perform well J Clin Epidemiol 62 974-981

[8] Crabbe D(2003)The development of QUADAS: A tool for the quality assessment of studies of diagnostic accuracy included in systematic reviews BMC Med Res Methodol 3 25-809

[9] Rubin S(1996)Adenosine technetium-99m sestamibi myocardial perfusion SPECT in women: Diagnostic efficacy in detection of coronary artery disease J Am Coll Cardiol 27 803-404

[10] Shaw LJ(2008)Superiority of exercise myocardial perfusion imaging compared with the exercise ECG in the diagnosis of coronary artery disease Coron Artery Dis 19 399-634