Making Sense of Naturalization: What Citizenship Means to Naturalizing Immigrants in Canada and the USA

被引:24
作者
Aptekar S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Department of Sociology, University of Massachusetts Boston, 100 Morrissey Boulevard, Boston, 02125, MA
关键词
Canada; Citizenship; Identity; Immigration; Naturalization; USA;
D O I
10.1007/s12134-015-0458-5
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Immigrant naturalization is both a barometer of inclusiveness and immigrant incorporation and a mechanism of social reproduction of the nation. This article reports on an interview-based study in suburban Toronto and New Jersey that investigated how immigrants explain their decisions to acquire citizenship. It analyzes respondents’ understandings of naturalization in light of different theories of citizenship and different dimensions of the concept. The study contributes to the literature by showing how many American immigrants interviewed while going through the naturalization process resisted framing naturalization as identity-changing, situating it instead as a common-sense move following permanent settlement and belonging. In contrast, Canadian respondents were more likely to characterize naturalization as an active process that tied them to a positively valued nation. While immigrant respondents in both countries were interested in voting and travel benefits of citizenship, only American respondents sought the protection that citizenship would afford in an anti-immigrant policy climate. I discuss how naturalization as a tool of civic integration and political empowerment resonates with immigrants’ own understandings of the process and consider the role played by the institutional contexts around naturalization and immigration more generally. © 2015, Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht.
引用
收藏
页码:1143 / 1161
页数:18
相关论文
共 46 条
  • [1] Aitken R., Notes on the Canadian exception: security certificates in critical context, Citizenship Studies, 12, 4, pp. 381-396, (2008)
  • [2] Aptekar S., Citizenship status and patterns of inequality in the United States and Canada, Social Science Quarterly, 95, 2, pp. 343-359, (2014)
  • [3] Aptekar S., The road to citizenship: what naturalization means for immigrants and the United States, (2015)
  • [4] Balistreri K.S., Van Hook J., The more things change the more they stay the same: Mexican naturalization before and after welfare reform, International Migration Review, 38, 1, pp. 113-130, (2004)
  • [5] Barnes A., Displacing danger: managing crime through deportation, Journal of International Migration and Integration, 10, 4, pp. 431-445, (2009)
  • [6] Basch L., Glick Schiller N., Szanton Blanc C., Nations unbound: transnational projects, postcolonial predicaments, and deterritorialized nation-states, (1994)
  • [7] Bauder H., Immigration debate in Canada: how newspapers reported, 1996–2004, Journal of International Migration and Integration, 9, 3, pp. 289-310, (2008)
  • [8] Bean F., Stevens G., America’s newcomers and the dynamics of diversity, (2003)
  • [9] Bloemraad I., Who claims dual citizenship? The limits of postnationalism, the possibilities of transnationalism and the persistence of traditional citizenship, International Migration Review, 38, pp. 389-426, (2004)
  • [10] Bloemraad I., Becoming a citizen: incorporating immigrants and refugees in the United States and Canada, (2006)