Preliminary experience on the safety and tolerability of mechanical “insufflation-exsufflation” in subjects with artificial airway

被引:23
作者
Sánchez-García M. [1 ]
Santos P. [2 ]
Rodríguez-Trigo G. [3 ]
Martínez-Sagasti F. [1 ]
Fariña-González T. [1 ]
del Pino-Ramírez Á. [1 ]
Cardenal-Sánchez C. [1 ]
Busto-González B. [1 ]
Requesens-Solera M. [1 ]
Nieto-Cabrera M. [1 ]
Romero-Romero F. [1 ]
Núñez-Reiz A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Critical Care Department, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, c/Prof. Martín Lagos s/n, Madrid
[2] Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation Service, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, c/Prof. Martín Lagos s/n, Madrid
[3] Service of Pulmonology, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, c/Prof. Martín Lagos s/n, Madrid
关键词
Airway clearance; Artificial airway; Endotracheal aspiration; Endotracheal intubation; Mechanical insufflation-exsufflation; Respiratory tract secretions; Safety; Secretion suctioning;
D O I
10.1186/s40635-018-0173-6
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Catheter suctioning of respiratory secretions in intubated subjects is limited to the proximal airway and associated with traumatic lesions to the mucosa and poor tolerance. “Mechanical insufflation-exsufflation” exerts positive pressure, followed by an abrupt drop to negative pressure. Potential advantages of this technique are aspiration of distal airway secretions, avoiding trauma, and improving tolerance. Methods: We applied insufflation of 50 cmH2O for 3 s and exsufflation of − 45 cmH2O for 4 s in patients with an endotracheal tube or tracheostomy cannula requiring secretion suctioning. Cycles of 10 to 12 insufflations-exsufflations were performed and repeated if secretions were aspirated and visible in the proximal artificial airway. Clinical and laboratory parameters were collected before and 5 and 60 min after the procedure. Subjects were followed during their ICU stay until discharge or death. Results: Mechanical insufflation-exsufflation was applied 26 times to 7 male and 6 female subjects requiring suctioning. Mean age was 62.6 ± 20 years and mean Apache II score 23.3 ± 7.4 points. At each session, a median of 2 (IQR 1; 2) cycles on median day of intubation 11.5 (IQR 6.25; 25.75) were performed. Mean insufflation tidal volume was 1043.6 ± 649.9 ml. No statistically significant differences were identified between baseline and post-procedure time points. Barotrauma, desaturation, atelectasis, hemoptysis, or other airway complication and hemodynamic complications were not detected. All, except one, of the mechanical insufflation-exsufflation sessions were productive, showing secretions in the proximal artificial airway, and were well tolerated. Conclusions: Our preliminary data suggest that mechanical insufflation-exsufflation may be safe and effective in patients with artificial airway. Safety and efficacy need to be confirmed in larger studies with different patient populations. Trial registration: EudraCT 2017-005201-13 (EU Clinical Trials Register). © 2018, The Author(s).
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 23 条
[21]  
Correger E., Murias G., Chacon E., Estruga A., Sales B., Lopez-Aguilar J., Montanya J., Lucangelo U., Garcia-Esquirol O., Villagra A., Villar J., Kacmarek R.M., Burgueno M.J., Blanch L., Interpretación de las curvas del respirador en pacientes con insuficiencia respiratoria aguda, Med Int, 36, pp. 294-306, (2012)
[22]  
Guerin C., Bourdin G., Leray V., Delannoy B., Bayle F., Germain M., Richard J.C., Performance of the coughassist insufflation-exsufflation device in the presence of an endotracheal tube or tracheostomy tube: a bench study, Respir Care, 56, pp. 1108-1114, (2011)
[23]  
Zhou C., Wu L., Ni F., Ji W., Wu J., Zhang H., Critical illness polyneuropathy and myopathy: a systematic review, Neural Regen Res, 9, pp. 101-110, (2014)