How do people order stimuli?

被引:0
作者
Simon Kemp
Randolph C. Grace
机构
[1] University of Canterbury,Psychology Department
来源
Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics | 2014年 / 76卷
关键词
Measurement theory; Memory; Ordering; Ranking; Category rating;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
People may find it easier to construct an order after first representing stimuli on a scale or categorizing them, particularly when the number of stimuli to be ordered is large or when some of them must be remembered. Five experiments tested this hypothesis. In two of these experiments (1 and 3), we asked participants to rank line lengths or to rank photographs by artistic value. The participants provided evidence of how they performed these tasks, and this evidence indicated that they often made use of some preliminary representation—either a metric or a categorization. Two further experiments (2 and 4) indicated that people rarely produced rankings when given a choice of assessment measures for either the length of lines or the artistic value of photographs. In Experiment 5, when the number of lines was larger or lines were only visible one at a time, participants were faster at estimating line lengths as a percentage of the card covered than at rank ordering the lengths. Overall, the results indicate that ordering stimuli is not an easy or natural process when the number of stimuli is large or when the stimuli are not all perceptible at once. An implication is that the psychological measures available to individuals are not likely to be purely ordinal when many of the elements being measured must be recalled.
引用
收藏
页码:1847 / 1859
页数:12
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]  
Alwin DF(1985)The measurement of values in surveys: A comparison of ratings and rankings Public Opinion Quarterly 49 535-552
[2]  
Krosnick JA(1987)Unidimensional scaling with efficient ranking methods Psychological Bulletin 101 304-311
[3]  
Chignell MH(1988)Parametric statistics and levels of measurement Psychological Bulletin 104 137-144
[4]  
Patty BW(1975)Scales and statistics Review of Educational Research 45 43-57
[5]  
Davison ML(2010)When can information from ordinal scale variables be integrated? Psychological Methods 15 398-412
[6]  
Sharma AR(1978)Memory psychophysics for visual area and length Memory & Cognition 6 327-335
[7]  
Gardner PL(1989)Reconciling Fechner and Stevens: Towards a unified psychophysical law Behavioral and Brain Sciences 12 251-320
[8]  
Kemp S(1984)The relativity of “absolute” judgements British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology 37 152-183
[9]  
Grace RC(2004)A model of aesthetic appreciation and aesthetic judgments British Journal of Psychology 95 489-508
[10]  
Kerst SM(1986)The criteria used to judge art: Marketplace and academic comparisons Empirical Studies of the Arts 4 163-174