The contribution of shadow banking risk spillover to the commercial banks in China: based on the DCC-BEKK-MVGARCH-Time-Varying CoVaR Model

被引:0
作者
Chen Zhu
机构
[1] Nanjing University of Finance and Economics,School of Finance
[2] Florida International University,Department of Finance, College of Business
来源
Electronic Commerce Research | 2023年 / 23卷
关键词
Shadow banking; Risk spillover contribution; Time-Varying CoVaR Model; G18; G21; G28;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
In recent years, with the rapid expansion of commercial banks' non-standardized business, the systematic correlation between shadow banking and commercial banks in China has been gradually enhanced, which enables the partial liquidity crisis of shadow banking to spread rapidly to commercial banks, leading to the increased vulnerability of China's financial system. Based on this, we built shadow banking indexes of trusts, securities, private lending and investments, introduced the dynamic correlation coefficient calculated by the dynamic conditional correlation multivariate GARCH model into the improved CoVaR model, and used the DCC-BEKK-MVGARCH-Time-Varying CoVaR Model to measure the risk overflow contribution of shadow banking in China. We find that shadow banking and commercial banks have an inherent relationship. Due to their own risks, different types of shadow banking contribute to the risk spillover to commercial banks in different degrees. The risk correlation between shadow banking and commercial banks fluctuates. Securities, trusts, private lending and investments shadow banking have different degrees of risk spillover contributions to commercial banks. Securities shadow banking has the highest risk spillover contribution. The next is trusts shadow banking. The risk spillover contributions from private lending and investments shadow banking are lower, but their volatilities are higher. The supervising department should standardize the information disclosure system of shadow banking and establish the risk firewall of commercial banks and shadow banking from the perspective of the risk spillover contribution.
引用
收藏
页码:2153 / 2181
页数:28
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]  
Shin HS(2009)Securitisation and financial stability The Economic Journal 119 309-332
[2]  
Haisen H(2015)Impact of the shadow banking system on monetary policy in China ICTACT Journal on Management Studies 1 1-12
[3]  
Yazdifar H(2016)Influencing factors and economic consequences of commercial banks engaging in shadow banking business: An empirical study based on the financing side of the shadow banking system Finance Research 01 66-82
[4]  
Zhu Jigao Hu(2017)Cross-contagion risk of shadow banking from the perspective of business correlation: Measurement based on TGC model Economic Issues 12 28-37
[5]  
Zhengfei SL(2016)Shadow banking: A review of the literature Banking Crises 142 164-188
[6]  
Xianming F(2017)Bank networks: Contagion, systemic risk and prudential policy Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 39 221-236
[7]  
Chu C(2018)Systemic risk in a structural model of bank default linkages Journal of Financial Stability 29 2577-2603
[8]  
Adrian T(2005)Measuring systemic risk: A risk management approach Journal of Banking & Finance LXXXVI 313-326
[9]  
Ashcraft AB(2004)Asset market linkages in crisis periods Review of Economics and Statistics 102 59-64
[10]  
Aldasoro I(2012)Capital shortfall: a new approach to ranking and regulating systemic risks The American economic review 106 1705-1741