A Decision Support Methodology for Integrated Urban Water Management in Remote Settlements

被引:0
作者
G. Tjandraatmadja
A. K. Sharma
T. Grant
F. Pamminger
机构
[1] CSIRO Land and Water,
[2] Life Cycle Strategies Pty Ltd,undefined
[3] Yarra Valley Water,undefined
来源
Water Resources Management | 2013年 / 27卷
关键词
Wastewater treatment; Decentralised system; Sustainable development; Design; Life cycle assessment; Multi-criteria analysis;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
This paper describes a decision support methodology for the selection of a wastewater treatment system based on integrated urban water management principles for a remote settlement with failing septic systems. Thirty-two service and treatment technologies options were considered, these included: (i) conventional gravity sewerage, (ii) common effluent drainage, (iii) community sewage treatment plant based on various technology options (lagoon treatment, Living Machine®, sequencing batch reactor, membrane biological reactor, rotating biological contactor, recirculating textile filter, extended aeration) with and without urine separation, greywater diversion or treatment and reuse at household scale. The options were assessed using a framework that considered technical, economic, environmental and social factors relevant to the local community and associated stakeholders (water utility, government agencies) and tools such as engineering design, life cycle assessment and multi-criteria analysis for evaluation of overall sustainability. Adoption of a systems approach allowed the identification of benefits and trade-offs among stakeholders creating opportunities for adoption of more innovative treatment options and maximisation of the sustainability of the service. The treatment option that maximised the social, environmental and economic benefits for the settlement consisted of individual households adopting greywater treatment, storage and reuse, urine separation and a community wastewater treatment plant with recirculating textile filter technology. This solution provided the required sanitation, increased the sources of water supply to residents, satisfied environmental regulator requirements, minimised nitrogen discharge to waterways and provided an option for beneficial reuse of urine for neighbouring farmers at a cost and management needs acceptable to the water utility.
引用
收藏
页码:433 / 449
页数:16
相关论文
共 73 条
[1]  
Balkema AJ(2002)Indicators of sustainability assessment of wastewater treatment systems Urban Water 4 153-161
[2]  
Preisig HA(2006)Experiences from implementation of a urine separation system: goals, planning, reality Build Environ 41 427-437
[3]  
Otterpol R(2002)Evaluation of onsite wastewater treatment technologies using sustainable development criteria Clean Techn Environ Policy 4 87-89
[4]  
Lambert FJD(1997)Towards sustainable urban drainage Water Sci Technol 35 53-63
[5]  
Berndtsson JC(2003)A laboratory study of auctions for reducing non‐point source pollution J Environ Econ Manag 46 446-471
[6]  
Bradley BR(1998)Characterization of the municipal wastewater part I human urine and a preliminary comparison with liquid cattle excretion Water Sci Technol 38 9-16
[7]  
Daigger GT(2002)Contaminant flows in urban residential water systems Urban Water 4 331-346
[8]  
Rubin R(2000)Assessing the sustainability of small wastewater systems – a context oriented approach Environ Impact Assess Rev 20 347-357
[9]  
Tchobanoglous G(2002)Urine separating sewage systems‐environmental effects and resource usage Water Sci Technol 46 333-340
[10]  
Butler D(1997)Source separated urine-nutrient and heavy metal content, water saving and faecal contamination Water Sci Technol 35 145-152