Assessing the Impact of Carbon Tax Differentiation in the European Union

被引:0
作者
Mustafa H. Babiker
Patrick Criqui
A. Denny Ellerman
John M. Reilly
Laurent L. Viguier
机构
[1] Massachusetts Institute of Technology,Faculty of Economics and Social Sciences
[2] Joint Program on the Science and Policy of Global Change,undefined
[3] USA,undefined
[4] Arab Planning Institute,undefined
[5] Institute of Economic Policy and Economics (IEPE-CNRS),undefined
[6] University of Geneva,undefined
来源
Environmental Modeling & Assessment | 2003年 / 8卷
关键词
Climate Policy; Abatement Cost; Marginal Abatement Cost; Welfare Cost; Equilibrium Effect;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
To what extent do the welfare costs associated with the implementation of the Burden Sharing Agreement in the European Union depend on sectoral allocation of emissions rights? What are the prospects for strategic climate policy to favor domestic production? This paper attempts to answer those questions using a CGE model featuring a detailed representation of the European economies. First, numerical simulations show that equalizing marginal abatement costs across domestic sectors greatly reduces the burden of the emissions constraint but also that other allocations may be preferable for some countries because of pre-existing tax distortions. Second, we show that the effect of a single country's attempt to undertake a strategic policy to limit impacts on its domestic energy-intensive industries has mixed effects. Exempting energy-intensive industries from the reduction program is a costly solution to maintain the international competitiveness of these industries; a tax-cum-subsidy approach is shown to be better than exemption policy to sustain exports. The welfare impact either policy – exemption or subsidy – on other European countries is likely to be small because of general equilibrium effects.
引用
收藏
页码:187 / 197
页数:10
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]  
Babiker M.(2000)Japanese nuclear power and the Kyoto agreement Journal of the Japanese and International Economies 14 169-188
[2]  
Reilly J.(2000)The Kyoto protocol and developing countries Energy Policy 28 525-536
[3]  
Ellerman D.(1994)Strategic environmental policy and international trade Journal of Public Economics 54 325-338
[4]  
Babiker M.(1963)Domestic distortions, tariffs and the theory of optimal subsidy Journal of Political Economy 71 44-50
[5]  
Reilly J.(1997)Carbon taxes with exemptions in an open economy: a general equilibrium analysis of the German tax initiative Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 32 189-203
[6]  
Jacoby H.(1996)Optimal environmental taxation in the presence of other taxes: General-equilibrium analyses American Economic Review 86 985-1000
[7]  
Barrett S.(1994)Environmental levies and distortionary taxation American Economic Review 94 1085-1089
[8]  
Bhagwati J.(1999)Marginal abatement costs of CO Energy Policy 27 585-601
[9]  
Ramaswami V.K.(2000) emission reductions, geographical flexibility and concrete ceilings: an assessment using the POLES model International Journal of Global Energy Issues 14 155-168
[10]  
Böhringer C.(1985)Kyoto and technology at world level: Costs of CO American Economic Review 75 139-152