Evaluation of various membrane filtration modules for the treatment of seawater

被引:1
|
作者
Hisham A. Maddah
Abdulazez S. Alzhrani
M. Bassyouni
M. H. Abdel-Aziz
Mohamed Zoromba
Ahmed M. Almalki
机构
[1] King Abdulaziz University,Department of Chemical Engineering
[2] Port Said University,Department of Chemical Engineering
[3] Alexandria University,Department of Chemical Engineering
[4] Port Said University,Department of Chemistry
来源
Applied Water Science | 2018年 / 8卷
关键词
Membrane; Filtration; Conductivity; Water treatment; Desalination; TDS; Seawater;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
This study was initiated to identify the treatment efficiency of various membrane filtration modules in the treatment of Red Sea water at Rabigh City. Filtration efficiency (membrane performance) was calculated in terms of water conductivities of feed and product. Four commercial membranes were utilized in the experiment work and they were Polyvinylidene difluoride (FP100), Polyethersulphone (ES404), Polyamide low-pressure film (AFC40) and Polyamide high-pressure film (AFC99). Different pressure values were applied on each membrane type to determine the optimal operating pressure for the treatment. pH levels of produced water were analyzed relative to feed water pH to check the effect of different applied pressures on pH variations. A comparison between the four membranes was established to select the ideal membrane for the treatment. Results showed that the optimal operating pressures for the four membranes FP100, ES404, AFC40 and AFC99 were 10, 30, 60 and 64 bar, respectively. In general, applying higher pressures would increase the treatment efficiency. An inverse relationship between water conductivity and applied pressure was noted, and pH levels slightly decreased at high pressures. Among the four selected membranes, AFC40 was the ideal choice for water treatment due to its relatively lower energy demand and higher treatment efficiency of 99.9%.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Evaluation of various membrane filtration modules for the treatment of seawater
    Maddah, Hisham A.
    Alzhrani, Abdulazez S.
    Bassyouni, M.
    Abdel-Aziz, M. H.
    Zoromba, Mohamed
    Almalki, Ahmed M.
    APPLIED WATER SCIENCE, 2018, 8 (06)
  • [2] OPTIMIZING TUBULAR MEMBRANE FILTRATION AND ULTRAFILTRATION MODULES
    TONELLI, F
    COBURN, JA
    ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 1988, 195 : 92 - IEC
  • [3] Ceramic membrane filtration as seawater RO pre-treatment: influencing factors on the ceramic membrane flux and quality
    Cui, Zhaoliang
    Peng, Wenbo
    Fan, Yiqun
    Xing, Weihong
    Xu, Nanping
    DESALINATION AND WATER TREATMENT, 2013, 51 (13-15) : 2575 - 2583
  • [4] Modelling approaches for filtration processes with novel submerged capillary modules in membrane bioreactors for wastewater treatment
    Geissler, S
    Wintgens, T
    Melin, T
    Vossenkaul, K
    Kullmann, C
    DESALINATION, 2005, 178 (1-3) : 125 - 134
  • [5] MEMBRANE FILTRATION TECHNIQUE FOR ENUMERATION OF ESCHERICHIA-COLI IN SEAWATER
    HALLS, S
    AYRES, PA
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED BACTERIOLOGY, 1974, 37 (01): : 105 - 109
  • [6] An impact of membrane resistance on the filtration efficiency at the protein fractionation along micro filtration modules
    Kuehnl, Wolfgang
    Piry, Alexander
    Kulozik, Ulrich
    CHEMIE INGENIEUR TECHNIK, 2008, 80 (08) : 1199 - 1205
  • [7] Comparative Evaluation of Membrane Filtration on the Tertiary Treatment of Synthetic Secondary Effluent
    Mortula, Md Maruf
    Abdelrahman, Malak
    Tatan, Bushra
    SEPARATIONS, 2022, 9 (03)
  • [8] Comparison of approaches to minimize fouling of a UF ceramic membrane in filtration of seawater
    Xu, Jia
    Chang, Chia-Yuan
    Hou, Jin
    Gao, Congjie
    CHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL, 2013, 223 : 722 - 728
  • [10] Impact of granular filtration on ultrafiltration membrane performance as pre-treatment to seawater desalination in presence of algal blooms
    Sabiri, Nour-Eddine
    Sechet, Veronique
    Jaouen, Pascal
    Pontie, Maxime
    Masse, Anthony
    Plantier, Severine
    JOURNAL OF WATER REUSE AND DESALINATION, 2018, 8 (02): : 262 - 277