Pre-service Primary Science Teachers’ Abilities for Solving a Measurement Problem Through Inquiry

被引:0
作者
Antonio García-Carmona
机构
[1] Universidad de Sevilla,Departamento de Didáctica de las Ciencias Experimentales y Sociales, Facultad de Ciencias de la Educación
来源
International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education | 2019年 / 17卷
关键词
Experimental activity; Initial teacher training; Inquiry-based science education; Measurement; Primary education;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
This article presents a qualitative descriptive-interpretive study about the abilities of pre-service primary science teachers (PPTs) to solve a measurement problem put to them as an activity of scientific inquiry. The participants in the study were 23 PPTs receiving training in science teaching, organized into small groups to solve the proposed problem. The data were collected through reports they prepared from a script with open-response questions that referred on the one hand to the planning, development and conclusions obtained with the scientific inquiry and on the other to promoting the PPTs’ metacognitive reflection regarding the difficulties encountered, the lessons learned and their proposals for improvement for future activities on similar measurements. The information was analysed in three phases to increasingly refine the coding of this. The results revealed that, overall, the PPTs were able to complete the scientific inquiry with a fairly acceptable degree of efficacy. A discussion of the results emphasizes the usefulness of the procedural-type scientific inquiry activities to initiate PPTs in their approach to inquiry-based science education.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 21
页数:20
相关论文
共 122 条
[1]  
Abrahams I(2009)Does practical work really motivate? A study of the affective value of practical work in secondary school science International Journal of Science Education 31 2335-2353
[2]  
Abrahams I(2008)Does practical work really work? A study of the effectiveness of practical work as a teaching and learning method in school science International Journal of Science Education 30 1945-1969
[3]  
Millar R(2014)Understanding students’ experiments—What kind of support do they need in inquiry tasks? International Journal of Science Education 36 2719-2749
[4]  
Arnold JC(2008)The many levels of inquiry Science and Children 46 26-29
[5]  
Kremer K(2010)Laboratorio didáctico de ciencias: Caminos de investigación [Didactic laboratory of science: Research paths] Revista Electrónica de Enseñanza de las Ciencias 9 88-110
[6]  
Mayer J(2010)Collaborative inquiry learning: Models, tools and challenges International Journal of Science Education 32 349-377
[7]  
Banchi H(2014)From cookbook experiments to inquiry based primary science: Influence of inquiry based lessons on interest and conceptual understanding Inquiry in Primary Science Education 1 20-31
[8]  
Bell R(2016)Reconceptualising inquiry in science education International Journal of Science Education 38 17-29
[9]  
Barolli E(2012)Motivational qualities of hands-on science activities for Turkish preservice kindergarten teachers Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education 8 73-82
[10]  
Laburú CE(2014)Do different levels of inquiry lead to different learning outcomes? A comparison between guided and structured inquiry International Journal of Science Education 36 1937-1959