Comparison of retinal layer thickness measurements obtained using two different swept-source optical coherence tomography imaging modes

[1] Esmaeelpour M(2010)Three-dimensional 1060-nm OCT: choroidal thickness maps in normal subjects and improved posterior segment visualization in cataract patients Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 51 5260-5266

[2] Povazay B(2015)Comparison of choroidal thicknesses using swept source and spectral domain optical coherence tomography in diseased and normal eyes Br J Ophthalmol 99 354-358

[3] Hermann B(2014)Evaluation of retinal and choroidal thickness by swept-source optical coherence tomography: repeatability and assessment of artifacts Am J Ophthalmol 157 1022-1032

[4] Tan CS(2015)Comparison of retinal thicknesses measured using swept-source and spectral-domain optical coherence tomography devices Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina 46 172-179

[5] Ngo WK(2014)Direct comparison of spectral-domain and swept-source OCT in the measurement of choroidal thickness in normal eyes Br J Ophthalmol 98 334-338

[6] Cheong KX(2013)Comparisons of choroidal thickness of normal eyes obtained by two different spectral-domain OCT instruments and one swept-source OCT instrument Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 54 7630-7636

[7] Mansouri K(2005)Diagnostic ability of optical coherence tomography with a normative database to detect localized retinal nerve fiber layer defects Ophthalmology 112 2157-2163

[8] Medeiros FA(2009)Sensitivity and specificity of time-domain versus spectral-domain optical coherence tomography in diagnosing early to moderate glaucoma Ophthalmology 116 2294-2299

[9] Tatham AJ(2015)Thickness of the macula, retinal nerve fiber layer, and ganglion cell layer in the epiretinal membrane: the repeatability study of optical coherence tomography Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 56 4554-4559

[10] Marchase N(2005)Macular segmentation with optical coherence tomography Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 46 2012-2017

[1] Esmaeelpour M(2010)Three-dimensional 1060-nm OCT: choroidal thickness maps in normal subjects and improved posterior segment visualization in cataract patients Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 51 5260-5266

[2] Povazay B(2015)Comparison of choroidal thicknesses using swept source and spectral domain optical coherence tomography in diseased and normal eyes Br J Ophthalmol 99 354-358

[3] Hermann B(2014)Evaluation of retinal and choroidal thickness by swept-source optical coherence tomography: repeatability and assessment of artifacts Am J Ophthalmol 157 1022-1032

[4] Tan CS(2015)Comparison of retinal thicknesses measured using swept-source and spectral-domain optical coherence tomography devices Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina 46 172-179

[5] Ngo WK(2014)Direct comparison of spectral-domain and swept-source OCT in the measurement of choroidal thickness in normal eyes Br J Ophthalmol 98 334-338

[6] Cheong KX(2013)Comparisons of choroidal thickness of normal eyes obtained by two different spectral-domain OCT instruments and one swept-source OCT instrument Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 54 7630-7636

[7] Mansouri K(2005)Diagnostic ability of optical coherence tomography with a normative database to detect localized retinal nerve fiber layer defects Ophthalmology 112 2157-2163

[8] Medeiros FA(2009)Sensitivity and specificity of time-domain versus spectral-domain optical coherence tomography in diagnosing early to moderate glaucoma Ophthalmology 116 2294-2299

[9] Tatham AJ(2015)Thickness of the macula, retinal nerve fiber layer, and ganglion cell layer in the epiretinal membrane: the repeatability study of optical coherence tomography Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 56 4554-4559

[10] Marchase N(2005)Macular segmentation with optical coherence tomography Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 46 2012-2017