A program of professional accreditation of hospital wards by the Italian Society of Internal Medicine (SIMI): self- versus peer-evaluation

被引:0
作者
Massimo Vanoli
Giancarlo Traisci
Alberto Franchini
Gianpiero Benetti
Pietro Serra
Maria Alice Monti
机构
[1] Internal Medicine Unit,Internal Medicine Unit
[2] Azienda Ospedaliera della Provincia di Lecco,Internal Medicine Unit III
[3] Hospital of Pescara,undefined
[4] Necstep,undefined
[5] Internal Medicine Unit,undefined
[6] University Sapienza,undefined
[7] Department of Internal Medicine,undefined
[8] IRCCS Ca’ Granda Policlinico,undefined
来源
Internal and Emergency Medicine | 2012年 / 7卷
关键词
Professional accreditation; Quality of care; Quality indicator(s); Standard(s);
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The Italian Society of Internal Medicine has developed a voluntary program of professional accreditation of the medical units run by its constituency. Participation in the program, which is meant to foster staff involvement in clinical governance, includes all the medical personnel and nurses. Accreditation is awarded provided the candidate unit is able to adhere to a pre-established set of quality standards, meet a number of clinical and organizational requirements and monitor specific indicators. Self-evaluation is the first step in the program, followed by a site visit by a team of peer internists experienced in quality auditing. The program, which has involved so far 19 units, has considered a number of clinical requirements related to the three most frequent diseases in Italian internal medicine wards: chronic heart failure (CHF), exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and hepatic cirrhosis with ascites (HCA). The comparison between self- and peer-evaluation witnessed less discrepancies for disease-related than for organizational requirements, the latter being met to a smaller degree by most units. In particular, concordance was higher for requirements and indicators pertaining to CHF and HCA than to COPD. This program of professional accreditation developed by the Italian Society of Internal Medicine has the potential to describe, monitor and improve clinical and organizational performances in internal medicine. It should also be seen as a contribution to implement the strategy of professional governance in hospitals.
引用
收藏
页码:27 / 32
页数:5
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]  
Berwick DM(1992)Heal thyself or heal thy system: can doctors help to improve medical care? Qual Health Care 1 S2-S8
[2]  
Moss F(1992)Achieving quality in hospital practice Qual Health Care 1 S17-S19
[3]  
Berwick DM(2003)Disseminating innovations in health care JAMA 289 1969-1975
[4]  
Werner RM(2008)Does hospital performance on process measures directly measure high quality care or is it a marker of unmeasured care? Health Serv Res 43 1464-1484
[5]  
Bradlow ET(2009)A new strategy to improve quality. Rewarding actions rather than measures JAMA 301 1375-1377
[6]  
Asch DA(2005)Guideline update for the diagnosis and management of chronic heart failure in the adult J Am Coll Cardiol 46 1-82
[7]  
Werner RM(2006)Comprehensive heart failure practice guideline J Card Fail 12 e1-e122
[8]  
McNutt R(2008)Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure Eur Heart J 29 2388-2442
[9]  
Moore KP(2004)Standards for the diagnosis and treatment of patients with COPD: a summary of the ATS/ERS position paper Eur Respir J 23 932-946
[10]  
Aithal GP(2004)Management of adults patients with ascites due to cirrhosis. Practice guidelines Hepatology 39 841-856