Shape variation and sex differences of the adult human mandible evaluated by geometric morphometrics

被引:2
作者
Chalazoniti, Aspasia [1 ]
Lattanzi, Wanda [2 ,3 ]
Halazonetis, Demetrios J. [4 ]
机构
[1] Natl & Kapodistrian Univ Athens, Sch Dent, Dept Prosthodont, Athens, Greece
[2] Univ Cattolica Sacro Cuore, Dept Life Sci & Publ Hlth, Rome, Italy
[3] Fdn Policlin Univ A Gemelli IRCCS, Unit Paediat Neurosurg, Rome, Italy
[4] Natl & Kapodistrian Univ Athens, Sch Dent, Dept Orthodont, Athens, Greece
关键词
DISCRIMINANT FUNCTION-ANALYSIS; LANDMARK IDENTIFICATION; GONIAL EVERSION; RAMUS FLEXURE; DIMORPHISM; TOMOGRAPHY; GROWTH; ERROR;
D O I
10.1038/s41598-024-57617-7
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
In cases of osseous defects, knowledge of the anatomy, and its age and sex-related variations, is essential for reconstruction of normal morphology. Here, we aimed at creating a 3D atlas of the human mandible in an adult sample using dense landmarking and geometric morphometrics. We segmented 50 male and 50 female mandibular surfaces from CBCT images (age range: 18.9-73.7 years). Nine fixed landmarks and 510 sliding semilandmarks were digitized on the mandibular surface, and then slid by minimizing bending energy against the average shape. Principal component analysis extracted the main patterns of shape variation. Sexes were compared with permutation tests and allometry was assessed by regressing on the log of the centroid size. Almost 49 percent of shape variation was described by the first three principal components. Shape variation was related to width, height and length proportions, variation of the angle between ramus and corpus, height of the coronoid process and inclination of the symphysis. Significant sex differences were detected, both in size and shape. Males were larger than females, had a higher ramus, more pronounced gonial angle, larger inter-gonial width, and more distinct antegonial notch. Accuracy of sexing based on the first two principal components in form space was 91 percent. The degree of edentulism was weakly related to mandibular shape. Age effects were not significant. The resulting atlas provides a dense description of mandibular form that can be used clinically as a guide for planning surgical reconstruction.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 71 条
  • [1] Statistical Shape Models: Understanding and Mastering Variation in Anatomy
    Ambellan, Felix
    Lamecker, Hans
    von Tycowicz, Christoph
    Zachow, Stefan
    [J]. BIOMEDICAL VISUALISATION, VOL 3, 2019, 1156 : 67 - 84
  • [2] Automated Detection of 3D Landmarks for the Elimination of Non-Biological Variation in Geometric Morphometric Analyses
    Aneja, D.
    Vora, S. R.
    Camci, E. D.
    Shapiro, L. G.
    Cox, T. C.
    [J]. 2015 IEEE 28TH INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON COMPUTER-BASED MEDICAL SYSTEMS (CBMS), 2015, : 78 - 83
  • [3] Predictive accuracy of sexing the mandible by ramus flexure
    Balci, Y
    Yavuz, MF
    Cagdir, S
    [J]. HOMO-JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE HUMAN BIOLOGY, 2005, 55 (03) : 229 - 237
  • [4] A Practical Guide to Sliding and Surface Semilandmarks in Morphometric Analyses
    Bardua, C.
    Felice, R. N.
    Watanabe, A.
    Fabre, A-C
    Goswami, A.
    [J]. INTEGRATIVE ORGANISMAL BIOLOGY, 2019, 1 (01)
  • [5] Introducing Human Mandible Identification [(hu)MANid]: A Free, Web-Based GUI to Classify Human Mandibles
    Berg, Gregory E.
    Kenyhercz, Michael W.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FORENSIC SCIENCES, 2017, 62 (06) : 1592 - 1598
  • [6] How did modern morphology evolve in the human mandible? The relationship between static adult allometry and mandibular variability in Homo sapiens
    Bergmann, Inga
    Hublin, Jean-Jacques
    Gunz, Philipp
    Freidline, Sarah E.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HUMAN EVOLUTION, 2021, 157
  • [7] Automatic landmark annotation in 3D surface scans of skulls: Methodological proposal and reliability study
    Bermejo, Enrique
    Taniguchi, Kei
    Ogawa, Yoshinori
    Martos, Ruben
    Valsecchi, Andrea
    Mesejo, Pablo
    Ibanez, Oscar
    Imaizumi, Kazuhiko
    [J]. COMPUTER METHODS AND PROGRAMS IN BIOMEDICINE, 2021, 210
  • [8] BJORK A, 1983, EUR J ORTHODONT, V5, P1
  • [9] Bookstein F L, 1997, Med Image Anal, V1, P225
  • [10] Bookstein FL., 1991, Morphometric Tools for Landmark Data: Geometry and Biology, P63