Endogenous Minimum Participation in International Environmental Treaties

被引:0
作者
Carlo Carraro
Carmen Marchiori
Sonia Oreffice
机构
[1] University of Venice,Department of Economics
[2] CEPR,Departamento de Fundamentos del Análisis Económico
[3] CEPS,undefined
[4] CESifo and Fondazione ENI E. Mattei,undefined
[5] London School of Economics and Fondazione ENI E. Mattei,undefined
[6] Universidad de Alicante,undefined
来源
Environmental and Resource Economics | 2009年 / 42卷
关键词
Agreements; Climate; Negotiations; Policy; Participation rule; H0; H4; O3;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Many international treaties come into force only after a minimum number of countries have signed and ratified the treaty. Minimum participation constraints are particularly frequent in the case of environmental treaties dealing with global commons, where free-riding incentives are strong. Why do countries that know they have an incentive to free-ride accept to “tie their hands” through the introduction of a minimum participation constraint? This article addresses the above issues by modeling the formation of an international treaty as a three-stage non-cooperative coalition formation game. Both the equilibrium minimum participation constraint and the number of signatories—the coalition size—are determined. This article, by showing that a non-trivial partial coalition, sustained by a binding minimum participation constraint, forms at the equilibrium, explains the occurrence of minimum participation clauses in most international environmental agreements. It also analyses the endogenous equilibrium size of the minimum participation constraint.
引用
收藏
页码:411 / 425
页数:14
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]  
Barrett S(1994)Self-enforcing international environmental agreements Oxf Econ Pap 46 878-894
[2]  
Black J(1992)Creating a good a atmosphere. Minimum participation for tackling the greenhouse effect Economica 60 281-293
[3]  
Levi MD(1996)Sequential formation of coalition with fixed payoff division Games Econ Behav 14 90-123
[4]  
de Meza D(1993)Strategies for the international protection of the environment J Public Econ 52 309-328
[5]  
Bloch F(1998)International environmental agreements. Incentives and political economy Eur Econ Rev 42 561-572
[6]  
Carraro C(1995)A core-theoretical solution for the design of cooperative agreements on trans-frontier pollution Int Tax Public Financ 2 279-293
[7]  
Siniscalco D(1997)The core of an economy with multilateral environmental externalities Int J Game Theory 26 379-401
[8]  
Carraro C(1983)On the stability of collusive price leadership Can J Econ 16 17-25
[9]  
Siniscalco D(2006)Stable international environmental agreements: an analytical approach J Public Econ Theory 8 247-263
[10]  
Chander P(2008)Game theoretic research on the design of international environmental agreements: insights, critical remarks and future challenges Int Rev Environ Resour Econ 2 1-39