Improving public support for climate action through multilateralism

被引:0
作者
Michael M. Bechtel
Kenneth F. Scheve
Elisabeth van Lieshout
机构
[1] University of Cologne,Department of Political Science and European Affairs, Cologne Center for Comparative Politics
[2] Swiss Institute for International Economics and Applied Economic Research,Department of Political Science
[3] Yale University,Department of Political Science
[4] Stanford University,undefined
来源
Nature Communications | / 13卷
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
For decades, policymakers have been attempting to negotiate multilateral climate agreements. One of the motivations for securing cooperation among multiple states is the belief that the public will be more supportive of adopting costly climate policies if other countries do so, both because this makes it more likely that important sustainability goals will be reached and because those efforts resonate with widely held fairness norms. However, some recent research suggests that public approval of climate action is independent of the policy choices made by other countries. Here, we present two different experimental studies fielded in multiple countries showing that multilateralism significantly increases public approval of costly climate action. Multilateralism makes climate policy more appealing by improving effectiveness beliefs and the policy’s perceived fairness. Pursuing climate action within a multilateral setting does not only promise improved policy impacts, but may also generate higher levels of public support. Preregistration: This study has been pre-registered at AEA RCT Registry under #AEARCTR-0004090.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 53 条
  • [1] Kennard A(2020)The enemy of my enemy. When firms support climate change regulation Int. Org. 74 187-221
  • [2] Bechtel MM(2019)Interests, norms and support for the provision of global public goods: the case of climate cooperation Br. J. Polit. Sci. 49 1333-1355
  • [3] Genovese F(2020)Beliefs about climate action consequences under weak global institutions: sectors, home bias, and international embeddedness Glob. Environ. Polit. 20 28-50
  • [4] Scheve KF(2021)Supply chain linkages and the extended carbon coalition Am. J. Polit. Sci. 65 69-87
  • [5] Bayer P(2021)Asset revaluation and the existential politics of climate change Int. Organ. 75 586-610
  • [6] Genovese F(2011)The problem of the commons: still unsettled after 100 years Am. Econ. Rev. 101 81-108
  • [7] Cory J(2015)The global politics of climate change: challenge for political science PS Polit. Sci. Polit. 48 19-26
  • [8] Lerner M(2017)Climate change and international relations (After Kyoto) Ann. Rev. Polit. Sci. 20 169-188
  • [9] Osgood I(2018)The politics of climate change adaptation Ann. Rev. Polit. Sci. 43 317-341
  • [10] Colgan JD(2019)Climate change: the ultimate challenge for economics Am. Econ. Rev. 109 1991-2014