Clinical Prediction from Structural Brain MRI Scans: A Large-Scale Empirical Study

被引:0
作者
Mert R. Sabuncu
Ender Konukoglu
机构
[1] Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging,
[2] Massachusetts General Hospital,undefined
[3] Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory,undefined
[4] Massachusetts Institute of Technology,undefined
来源
Neuroinformatics | 2015年 / 13卷
关键词
Image-based prediction; Computer aided diagnosis; Machine learning; MRI;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Multivariate pattern analysis (MVPA) methods have become an important tool in neuroimaging, revealing complex associations and yielding powerful prediction models. Despite methodological developments and novel application domains, there has been little effort to compile benchmark results that researchers can reference and compare against. This study takes a significant step in this direction. We employed three classes of state-of-the-art MVPA algorithms and common types of structural measurements from brain Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) scans to predict an array of clinically relevant variables (diagnosis of Alzheimer’s, schizophrenia, autism, and attention deficit and hyperactivity disorder; age, cerebrospinal fluid derived amyloid-β levels and mini-mental state exam score). We analyzed data from over 2,800 subjects, compiled from six publicly available datasets. The employed data and computational tools are freely distributed (https://www.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/lab/mripredict), making this the largest, most comprehensive, reproducible benchmark image-based prediction experiment to date in structural neuroimaging. Finally, we make several observations regarding the factors that influence prediction performance and point to future research directions. Unsurprisingly, our results suggest that the biological footprint (effect size) has a dramatic influence on prediction performance. Though the choice of image measurement and MVPA algorithm can impact the result, there was no universally optimal selection. Intriguingly, the choice of algorithm seemed to be less critical than the choice of measurement type. Finally, our results showed that cross-validation estimates of performance, while generally optimistic, correlate well with generalization accuracy on a new dataset.
引用
收藏
页码:31 / 46
页数:15
相关论文
共 344 条
[1]  
Chang C-C(2011)LIBSVM: a library for support vector machines ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology (TIST) 2 27-2230
[2]  
Lin C-J(2012)Individual subject classification for Alzheimer’s disease based on incremental learning using a spatial frequency representation of cortical thickness data NeuroImage 59 2217-70
[3]  
Cho Y(2012)Does feature selection improve classification accuracy? Impact of sample size and feature selection on classification using anatomical magnetic resonance images NeuroImage 60 59-297
[4]  
Seong J-K(1995)Support-vector networks Machine Learning 20 273-781
[5]  
Jeong Y(2009)Prognostic and diagnostic potential of the structural neuroanatomy of depression PloS One 4 e6353-194
[6]  
Shin SY(2011)Automatic classification of patients with Alzheimer’s disease from structural MRI: a comparison of ten methods using the ADNI database NeuroImage 56 766-1227
[7]  
Chu C(1999)Cortical surface-based analysis: I. Segmentation and surface reconstruction NeuroImage 9 179-2035
[8]  
Hsu A-L(2008)Individual patient diagnosis of AD and FTD via high-dimensional pattern classification of MRI NeuroImage 41 1220-70
[9]  
Chou K-H(2009)Longitudinal progression of Alzheimer’s-like patterns of atrophy in normal older adults: the SPARE-AD index Brain 132 2026-56
[10]  
Bandettini P(2009)Automated computer differential classification in Parkinsonian syndromes via pattern analysis on MRI Academic Radiology 16 61-105