The influence of stimulus direction and eccentricity on pro- and anti-saccades in humans

被引:0
作者
Joan M. Dafoe
Irene T. Armstrong
Doug P. Munoz
机构
[1] Queen’s University,Centre for Neuroscience Studies, Room 234, Botterell Hall, Departments of Physiology and Psychology
来源
Experimental Brain Research | 2007年 / 179卷
关键词
Antisaccades; Prosaccades; Saccade; Eye movement; Direction; Eccentricity;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
We examined the sensory and motor influences of stimulus eccentricity and direction on saccadic reaction times (SRTs), direction-of-movement errors, and saccade amplitude for stimulus-driven (prosaccade) and volitional (antisaccade) oculomotor responses in humans. Stimuli were presented at five eccentricities, ranging from 0.5° to 8°, and in eight radial directions around a central fixation point. At 0.5° eccentricity, participants showed delayed SRT and increased direction-of-movement errors consistent with misidentification of the target and fixation points. For the remaining eccentricities, horizontal saccades had shorter mean SRT than vertical saccades. Stimuli in the upper visual field trigger overt shifts in gaze more easily and faster than in the lower visual field: prosaccades to the upper hemifield had shorter SRT than to the lower hemifield, and more anti-saccade direction-of-movement errors were made into the upper hemifield. With the exception of the 0.5° stimuli, SRT was independent of eccentricity. Saccade amplitude was dependent on target eccentricity for prosaccades, but not for antisaccades within the range we tested. Performance matched behavioral measures described previously for monkeys performing the same tasks, confirming that the monkey is a good model for the human oculomotor function. We conclude that an upper hemifield bias lead to a decrease in SRT and an increase in direction errors.
引用
收藏
页码:563 / 570
页数:7
相关论文
共 85 条
[21]  
Fischer B(1996)Release of fixation for pursuit and saccades in humans: evidence for shared inputs acting on different neural substrates J Neurophysiol 96 2822-2833
[22]  
Ramsperger E(2001)Less attention is more in the preparation of antisaccades, but not prosaccades Nat Neurosci 4 1037-1042
[23]  
Fischer B(2004)When pros become cons for anti- versus prosaccades: factors with opposite or common effects on different saccade types Exp Brain Res 155 231-244
[24]  
Weber H(1995) Evidence for interactions between target selection and visual fixation for saccade generation in humans Exp Brain Res 103 168-173
[25]  
Fischer B(2004)Look away: the anti-saccade task and the voluntary control of eye movement Nat Rev Neurosci 5 218-228
[26]  
Weber H(1998)Age-related performance of human subjects on saccadic eye movement tasks Exp Brain Res 121 391-400
[27]  
Fischer B(1995) Cortical control of saccades Ann Neurol 95 557-567
[28]  
Weber H(1990)Functional specialization in the lower and upper visual fields in humans: its ecological origins and neurophysiological implications Behav Brain Sci 13 519-575
[29]  
Fischer B(2002)Saccadic inhibition in voluntary and reflexive saccades J Cogn Neurosci 14 371-388
[30]  
Biscaldi M(1967)Effects of components of displacement-step stimuli upon latency for saccadic eye movement J Opt Soc Am 57 1024-1029