The influence of stimulus direction and eccentricity on pro- and anti-saccades in humans

被引:0
作者
Joan M. Dafoe
Irene T. Armstrong
Doug P. Munoz
机构
[1] Queen’s University,Centre for Neuroscience Studies, Room 234, Botterell Hall, Departments of Physiology and Psychology
来源
Experimental Brain Research | 2007年 / 179卷
关键词
Antisaccades; Prosaccades; Saccade; Eye movement; Direction; Eccentricity;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
We examined the sensory and motor influences of stimulus eccentricity and direction on saccadic reaction times (SRTs), direction-of-movement errors, and saccade amplitude for stimulus-driven (prosaccade) and volitional (antisaccade) oculomotor responses in humans. Stimuli were presented at five eccentricities, ranging from 0.5° to 8°, and in eight radial directions around a central fixation point. At 0.5° eccentricity, participants showed delayed SRT and increased direction-of-movement errors consistent with misidentification of the target and fixation points. For the remaining eccentricities, horizontal saccades had shorter mean SRT than vertical saccades. Stimuli in the upper visual field trigger overt shifts in gaze more easily and faster than in the lower visual field: prosaccades to the upper hemifield had shorter SRT than to the lower hemifield, and more anti-saccade direction-of-movement errors were made into the upper hemifield. With the exception of the 0.5° stimuli, SRT was independent of eccentricity. Saccade amplitude was dependent on target eccentricity for prosaccades, but not for antisaccades within the range we tested. Performance matched behavioral measures described previously for monkeys performing the same tasks, confirming that the monkey is a good model for the human oculomotor function. We conclude that an upper hemifield bias lead to a decrease in SRT and an increase in direction errors.
引用
收藏
页码:563 / 570
页数:7
相关论文
共 85 条
[1]  
Abed F(1991)Cultural influences on visual scanning patterns J Cross Cult Psychol 22 525-534
[2]  
Bell AH(2000)Influence of stimulus eccentricity and direction on characteristics of pro- and antisaccades in non-human primates J Neurophysiol 84 2595-2604
[3]  
Everling S(2000)Control of saccadic initiation in a countermanding task using visual and auditory stop signals Exp Brain Res 133 431-441
[4]  
Munoz DP(2002)Event-related fMRI responses in the human frontal eye fields in a randomized pro-and antisaccade task Exp Brain Res 145 270-274
[5]  
Cabel DWJ(2001)Superior performance for visually guided pointing in the lower visual field Exp Brain Res 137 303-308
[6]  
Armstrong IT(1998)The antisaccade: a review of basic research and clinical studies Neuropsychologia 36 885-889
[7]  
Reingold E(1984)Human express saccades-extremely short reaction times of goal directed eye movements Exp Brain Res 57 191-195
[8]  
Munoz DP(1992)Characteristics of “anti” saccades in man Exp Brain Res 89 415-424
[9]  
Cornelissen FW(1993)Express saccades and visual attention Behav Brain Res 16 553-610
[10]  
Kimmig H(1997)Effects of stimulus conditions on the performance of antisaccades in man Exp Brain Res 97 191-200