Seroprevalence and risk factors for bovine brucellosis in the state of Paraná, Brazil: an analysis after 18 years of ongoing control measures

被引:0
作者
Diego Leonardo Rodrigues
Elenice Aparecida Amorim
Fernando Ferreira
Marcos Amaku
Oswaldo Santos Baquero
José Henrique de Hildebrand e Grisi Filho
Ricardo Augusto Dias
Marcos Bryan Heinemann
Evelise Oliveira Telles
Vitor Salvador Picão Gonçalves
Cord Heuer
José Soares Ferreira Neto
机构
[1] Ministry of Agriculture,Department of Preventive Veterinary Medicine
[2] Livestock and Supply of Brazil (MAPA),undefined
[3] Paraná Agribusiness Defence Agency (ADAPAR),undefined
[4] University of São Paulo,undefined
[5] EpiPlan,undefined
[6] Faculty of Agronomy and Veterinary Medicine,undefined
[7] University of Brasília,undefined
[8] Ala Central Do Instituto Central de Ciências,undefined
[9] The Epicentre,undefined
[10] Massey University,undefined
[11] Wool Building,undefined
[12] University Avenue,undefined
[13] Massey University Manawatu (Turitea),undefined
来源
Tropical Animal Health and Production | 2021年 / 53卷
关键词
Cattle; Prevalence; Risk factors; Brazil;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Seroprevalence and risk factors of bovine brucellosis (Brucella abortus) in herds and cattle were estimated by a cross-sectional study in the state of Paraná, Brazil. The state was divided into seven regions and a random, two-stage sampling was performed on properties and cattle from each region between 2018 and 2019. Serum samples were collected from 11,592 cows over 24 months from 1,757 properties and a questionnaire was applied to identify potential risk factors. As recommended by the National Program for the Control and Eradication of Animal Brucellosis and Tuberculosis (PNCEBT), serological testing for the detection of anti-Brucella antibodies included the buffered plate agglutination test (screening test) and the fluorescence polarization assay (confirmatory test). The seroprevalence of bovine brucellosis on properties and in cattle was 4.87% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.98–5.93%) and 2.24% (95% CI: 1.47–3.41%), respectively. Multiple logistic regression analysis identified larger herd size and failure to test for brucellosis as risk factors for the presence of anti-B. abortus antibodies. These results demonstrate no change in the prevalence when comparing initial studies conducted in 2002. Given our findings, it is recommended that policies for brucellosis control include a widespread vaccination program for higher prevalence areas and eradication approach to lower prevalence areas. All steps related to correct immunization of the herds should be verified and improved by training and education. Health education action must be carried out informing farmers about the risks of introducing animals not tested for brucellosis into their herds and the benefits of testing their herds regularly.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 139 条
  • [31] Ferreira F(undefined)undefined undefined undefined undefined-undefined
  • [32] Galvis JOA(undefined)undefined undefined undefined undefined-undefined
  • [33] Gonçalves VSP(undefined)undefined undefined undefined undefined-undefined
  • [34] Heinemann MB(undefined)undefined undefined undefined undefined-undefined
  • [35] Telles EO(undefined)undefined undefined undefined undefined-undefined
  • [36] Neto JSF(undefined)undefined undefined undefined undefined-undefined
  • [37] Aznar MN(undefined)undefined undefined undefined undefined-undefined
  • [38] Samartino LE(undefined)undefined undefined undefined undefined-undefined
  • [39] Humblet M-F(undefined)undefined undefined undefined undefined-undefined
  • [40] Saegerman C(undefined)undefined undefined undefined undefined-undefined