Instrument for measuring the key factors of success in software process improvement

被引:95
作者
Dybå T. [1 ]
机构
[1] Found. for Sci. and Indust. Research, Norwegian Institute of Technology
关键词
Software process improvement; success factors; measurement instrument;
D O I
10.1023/A:1009800404137
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Understanding how to implement SPI successfully is arguably the most challenging issue facing the SPI field today. The SPI literature contains many case studies of successful companies and descriptions of their SPI programs. However, there has been no systematic attempt to synthesize and organize the prescriptions offered. The research efforts to date are limited and inconclusive and without adequate theoretical and psychometric justification. This paper provides a synthesis of prescriptions for successful quality management and process improvement found from an extensive review of the quality management, organizational learning, and software process improvement literature. The literature review was confirmed by empirical studies among both researchers and practitioners. The main result is an instrument for measuring the key factors of success in SPI based on data collected from 120 software organizations. The measures were found to have satisfactory psychometric properties. Hence, managers can use the instrument to guide SPI activities in their respective organizations and researchers can use it to build models to relate the facilitating factors to both learning processes and SPI outcomes.
引用
收藏
页码:357 / 390
页数:33
相关论文
共 108 条
[1]  
Ahire S.L., Golhar D.Y., Waller M.A., Development and Validation of TQM Implementation Constructs, Decision Sciences, 27, 1, pp. 23-56, (1996)
[2]  
Anastasi A., Urbina S., Psychological Testing, Seventh Edition, (1997)
[3]  
Argyris C., Schon D.A., Organizational Learning: A Theory of Action Perspective, Reading, (1978)
[4]  
Argyris C., Schon D.A., Organizational Learning II: Theory, Method, and Practice, Reading, (1996)
[5]  
Bagozzi R.P., Measurement in Marketing Research: Basic Principles of Questionnaire Design, Principles of Marketing Research, pp. 1-49, (1996)
[6]  
Baruch Y., Response Rate in Academic Studies - A Comparative Analysis, Human Relations, 52, 4, pp. 421-438, (1999)
[7]  
Basili V.R., The Role of Experimentation in Software Engineering: Past, Current, and Future, Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE-18), pp. 442-449, (1996)
[8]  
Basili V.R., Caldiera G., Improve Software Quality by Reusing Knowledge and Experience, Sloan Management Review, 37, pp. 55-64, (1995)
[9]  
Basili V.R., Rombach H.D., The TAME Project: Towards Improvement-Oriented Software Environments, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 14, 6, pp. 758-773, (1988)
[10]  
Basili V.R., Selby R.W., Paradigms for Experimentation and Empirical Studies in Software Engineering, Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 32, 1-2, pp. 171-191, (1991)