Risk based optimal design of detention dams considering uncertain inflows

被引:1
作者
J. Yazdi
A. Doostparast Torshizi
B. Zahraie
机构
[1] Shahid Beheshti University,Faculty of Engineering, Department of Civil, Water and Environmental Engineering
[2] Islamic Azad University,College of Engineering and Technology, Science and Research Branch
[3] Amirkabir University of Technology (Tehran Polytechnic),Department of Industrial Engineering
[4] University of Tehran,Center of Excellence on “Infrastructure Engineering and Management”, School of Civil Engineering, College of Engineering
来源
Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment | 2016年 / 30卷
关键词
Optimization; Flood; CVaR; Neural networks; ACO; Risk;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
This study deals with the optimal design of detention dams under flood discharge uncertainties using a simulation-based optimization approach. An extended methodology is represented by integrating the ant colony optimization (ACO), artificial neural networks, and various risk measures including: expected flood discharge, value at risk, and conditional value at risk (CVaR). For this purpose, first, the neural network is trained by the results of a hydrodynamic model and then it is used to measure different risk indices under flood uncertainties. The proposed approach is then applied to a real case and optimal designs are determined by the search algorithm-i.e. ACO. Different optimal designs are obtained for the storage detention dams when different risk concepts are implemented as the objective function in the system modeling. Particularly, when the expected value measure is combined with the CVaR, the cost of optimal design is nearly two times smaller than those obtained by the formulation with independent objective functions whereas the obtained solution could efficiently minimize both E(Qd) and CVaR. The optimal solutions have especial capabilities in terms of performance and cost levels and this gives the stakeholders and decision makers to construct a framework to choose the final design when there are different attitudes and interests for flood risk management.
引用
收藏
页码:1457 / 1471
页数:14
相关论文
共 115 条
[1]  
Afshar MH(2006)Improving the efficiency of ant algorithms using adaptive refinement: application to storm water network design Adv Water Resour 29 1371-1382
[2]  
Afshar A(2009)Non-dominated archiving multi-colony ant algorithm for multi-objective optimization: application to multi-purpose reservoir operation Eng Optim 41 313-325
[3]  
Sharifi A(2012)Estimation of flood inundation probabilities using global hazard indexes based on hydrodynamic variables Phys Chem Earth Parts A/B/C 42–44 119-129
[4]  
Jalali MR(2009)State of the art for genetic algorithms and beyond in water resources planning and management J Water Resour Plan Manag ASCE 40 1-20
[5]  
Aronica GT(2013)Characterising performance of environmental models Environ Model Softw 18 503-511
[6]  
Candela A(2003)Risk assessment in energy trading IEEE Trans Power Syst 19 388-402
[7]  
Fabio P(2005)Sampling-based flood risk analysis for fluvial dike systems Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 11 335-347
[8]  
Santoro M(2014)Ant-colony optimization of pumping schedule to minimize the energy cost using variable-speed pumps in water distribution networks Urb Water J 49 359-368
[9]  
Bennett ND(2013)Optimal offering strategy considering the risk management for wind power producers in electricity market Int J Electr Power Energy Syst 139 520-533
[10]  
Croke BFW(2013)Reliability-based flood management in urban watersheds considering climate change impacts J Water Resour Plan Manag 20 879-898