MSI testingWhat’s new? What should be considered?MSI-TestungWas ist neu? Was ist zu beachten?

被引:0
|
作者
Josef Rüschoff
Gustavo Baretton
Hendrik Bläker
Wolfgang Dietmaier
Manfred Dietel
Arndt Hartmann
Lars-Christian Horn
Korinna Jöhrens
Thomas Kirchner
Ruth Knüchel
Doris Mayr
Sabine Merkelbach-Bruse
Hans-Ulrich Schildhaus
Peter Schirmacher
Markus Tiemann
Katharina Tiemann
Wilko Weichert
Reinhard Büttner
机构
[1] Nordhessen und Targos Molecular Pathology GmbH,Institute of Pathology
[2] University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus,Institute of Pathology
[3] University Hospital Leipzig,Institute of Pathology
[4] Universität Regensburg,Institute of Pathology, Center of Molecular Pathological Diagnostics
[5] University Hospital Charité,Institute of Pathology
[6] Campus Mitte,Pathological Institute
[7] University Erlangen-Nürnberg,Pathological Institute
[8] Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich,Institute of Pathology
[9] University Hospital RWTH Aachen,Institute of Pathology
[10] University Hospital Cologne,Institute of Pathology
[11] University Hospital Essen,Pathological Institute
[12] University Hospital Heidelberg,Fangdieckstr. 75a
[13] Institute of Hematopathology Hamburg,Institute of Pathology
[14] Technical University Munich,undefined
来源
Der Pathologe | 2021年 / 42卷
关键词
DNA mismatch repair; Endometrial carcinoma; Immune checkpoint inhibitors; Microsatellite instability; Prognosis; DNA-Mismatch-Reparatur; Endometriumkarzinome; Immuncheckpoint-Inhibitoren; Mikrosatelliteninstabilität; Prognose; Endometriumkarzinome;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Based on new trial data regarding immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), the detection of high-grade microsatellite instability (MSI-H) or underlying deficient mismatch repair protein (dMMR) is now becoming increasingly important for predicting treatment response. For the first time, a PD‑1 ICI (pembrolizumab) has been approved by the European Medicines Agency (EMA) for first-line treatment of advanced (stage IV) dMMR/MSI‑H colorectal cancer (CRC). Further indications, such as dMMR/MSI‑H endometrial carcinoma (EC), have already succeeded (Dostarlimab, 2nd line treatment) and others are expected to follow before the end of 2021. The question of optimal testing in routine diagnostics should therefore be re-evaluated. Based on a consideration of the strengths and weaknesses of the widely available methods (immunohistochemistry and PCR), a test algorithm is proposed that allows quality assured, reliable, and cost-effective dMMR/MSI‑H testing. For CRC and EC, testing is therefore already possible at the primary diagnosis stage, in line with international recommendations (NICE, NCCN). The clinician is therefore enabled from the outset to consider not only the predictive but also the prognostic and predispositional implications of such a test when counseling patients and formulating treatment recommendations. As a basis for quality assurance, participation in interlaboratory comparisons and continuous documentation of results (e.g., QuIP Monitor) are strongly recommended.
引用
收藏
页码:110 / 118
页数:8
相关论文
共 4 条
  • [1] MSI-TestungWas ist neu? Was ist zu beachten?MSI testingWhat is new? What should be considered? German version
    Josef Rüschoff
    Gustavo Baretton
    Hendrik Bläker
    Wolfgang Dietmaier
    Manfred Dietel
    Arndt Hartmann
    Lars-Christian Horn
    Korinna Jöhrens
    Thomas Kirchner
    Ruth Knüchel
    Doris Mayr
    Sabine Merkelbach-Bruse
    Hans-Ulrich Schildhaus
    Peter Schirmacher
    Markus Tiemann
    Katharina Tiemann
    Wilko Weichert
    Reinhard Büttner
    Der Pathologe, 2021, 42 : 414 - 423
  • [2] MSI testing What's new? What should be considered?
    Rueschoff, Josef
    Baretton, Gustavo
    Blaeker, Hendrik
    Dietmaier, Wolfgang
    Dietel, Manfred
    Hartmann, Arndt
    Horn, Lars-Christian
    Joehrens, Korinna
    Kirchner, Thomas
    Knuechel, Ruth
    Mayr, Doris
    Merkelbach-Bruse, Sabine
    Schildhaus, Hans-Ulrich
    Schirmacher, Peter
    Tiemann, Markus
    Tiemann, Katharina
    Weichert, Wilko
    Buettner, Reinhard
    PATHOLOGE, 2021, 42 (SUPPL 1): : 110 - 118
  • [3] MSI testing What is new? What should be considered? German version
    Rueschoff, Josef
    Baretton, Gustavo
    Blaeker, Hendrik
    Dietmaier, Wolfgang
    Dietel, Manfred
    Hartmann, Arndt
    Horn, Lars-Christian
    Joehrens, Korinna
    Kirchner, Thomas
    Knuchel, Ruth
    Mayr, Doris
    Merkelbach-Bruse, Sabine
    Schildhaus, Hans-Ulrich
    Schirmacher, Peter
    Tiemann, Markus
    Tiemann, Katharina
    Weichert, Wilko
    Buettner, Reinhard
    PATHOLOGE, 2021, 42 (04): : 414 - 423
  • [4] FIGO-Klassifikation für das Zervixkarzinom 2019 – was ist neu?The 2019 FIGO classification for cervical carcinoma—what’s new?
    L.-C. Horn
    C. E. Brambs
    S. Opitz
    U. A. Ulrich
    A. K. Höhn
    Der Pathologe, 2019, 40 : 629 - 635