Children’s Social Appraisal of Exclusion in Friendship Groups

被引:0
作者
Jones S.E. [1 ]
Rutland A. [2 ]
机构
[1] Division of Psychology, Sociology and Education, Queen Margaret University, Queen Margaret Drive, Edinburgh
[2] Goldsmiths, University of London, London
关键词
Assertive bystanding; Group-based emotion; Social appraisal theory; Social exclusion;
D O I
10.1007/s42380-019-00022-w
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Previous research has shown that group processes are particularly pertinent to children’s bullying, and who they socially exclude and include. This paper looks at how children’s responses to social exclusion change according to their friends’ group-based emotions. Children aged 8–11 years (N = 77) read stories about a friendship group to which they were said to belong and an instance of mild social exclusion. In the stories, the participants’ friends’ emotional reaction to the exclusion (pleased versus angry) was manipulated. Measures of assertive bystanding intentions and responses towards the friendship group and the social exclusion were taken. Children showed more assertive bystanding intentions when their friendship group was depicted as angry and they reported more anger when reacting to social exclusion. A mediation effect was found, with a perception of the friendship group’s emotion as anger being related to increased assertive bystanding, through an increase in the participant’s own anger towards their group’s act of social exclusion. This study is among the first to show that from 8 years of age, the social appraisal of group emotions can account for children’s reactions to social exclusion in a friendship group. Directions for future research in social appraisal of group-based emotion in social exclusion situations are discussed. © 2019, The Author(s).
引用
收藏
页码:129 / 138
页数:9
相关论文
共 65 条
[1]  
Abrams D., Rutland A., The development of subjective group dynamics, Intergroup attitudes and relations in childhood through adulthood, pp. 47-65, (2008)
[2]  
Abrams D., Rutland A., Children’s understanding of deviance and group dynamics: the development of subjective group dynamics, Rebels in groups: dissent, deviance, difference and defiance, pp. 135-157, (2011)
[3]  
Abrams D., Rutland A., Cameron L., Marques J., The development of subjective group dynamics: when in-group bias gets specific, British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 21, pp. 155-176, (2003)
[4]  
Abrams D., Weick M., Thomas D., Colbe H., Franklin K.M., On-line ostracism affects children differentially from adolescents and adults, British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 29, pp. 110-123, (2011)
[5]  
Abrams D., Powell C., Palmer S.B., Vyer J., Toward a contextualized social developmental account of children’s group-based inclusion and exclusion, In the Wiley Handbook of Group Processes in Children and Adolescents, (2017)
[6]  
Barhight L.R., Hubbard J.A., Hyde C.T., Children’s physiological and emotional reactions to witnessing bullying predict bystander intervention, Child Development, 84, pp. 375-390, (2013)
[7]  
Bennett M., Yuill N., Banerjee R., Thomson S., Children’s understanding of extended identity, Developmental Psychology, 34, 2, pp. 322-331, (1998)
[8]  
Bierman K.L., Kalvin C.B., Heinrichs B.S., Early childhood precursors and adolescent sequelae of grade school peer rejection and victimization, Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology, 44, 3, pp. 367-379, (2015)
[9]  
Buhs E.S., Ladd G.W., Herald S.L., Peer exclusion and victimization: processes that mediate the relation between peer group rejection and children’s classroom engagement and achievement?, Journal of Educational Psychology, 98, pp. 1-13, (2006)
[10]  
Doosje B., Spears R., Ellemers N., Social identity as both cause and effect: the development of group identification in response to anticipated and actual changes in the intergroup status hierarchy, British Journal of Social Psychology, 41, pp. 57-76, (2002)