A systematic review of existing national priorities for child health research in sub-Saharan Africa

被引:6
作者
Swingler G.H. [1 ]
Irlam J.H. [1 ,2 ]
Macharia W.M. [3 ]
Tietche F. [4 ]
Meremikwu M.M. [5 ]
机构
[1] School of Child and Adolescent Health, University of Cape Town, Cape Town
[2] Directorate of Primary Health Care, University of Cape Town, Cape Town
[3] Department of Paediatrics and Child Health, University of Nairobi, Nairobi
[4] Department of Paediatrics, Faculty of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University of Yaoundé, Yaoundé
[5] Department of Paediatrics, University of Calabar, Cross River State
关键词
Identifiable Group; Prioritisation Process; Global Forum; National Health Research System; Child Health Research;
D O I
10.1186/1478-4505-3-7
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Background: We systematically reviewed existing national child health research priorities in Sub-Saharan Africa, and the processes used to determine them. Methods: Collaborators from a purposive sample of 20 WHO-AFRO Region countries, assisted by key informants from a range of governmental, non-governmental, research and funding organisations and universities, identified and located potentially eligible prioritisation documents. Included documents were those published between 1990 and 2002 from national or nationally accredited institutions describing national health research priorities for child health, alone or as part of a broader report in which children were a clearly identifiable group. Laboratory, clinical, public health and policy research were included. Two reviewers independently assessed eligibility for inclusion and extracted data. Results: Eight of 33 potentially eligible reports were included. Five reports focused on limited areas of child health. The remaining three included child-specific categories in reports of general research priorities, with two such child-specific categories limited to reproductive health. In a secondary analysis of Essential National Health Research reports that included children, though not necessarily as an identifiable group, the reporting of priorities varied markedly in format and numbers of priorities listed, despite a standard recommended approach. Comparison and synthesis of reported priorities was not possible. Conclusions: Few systematically developed national research priorities for child health exist in sub-Saharan Africa. Children's interests may be distorted in prioritisation processes that combine all age groups. Future development of priorities requires a common reporting framework and specific consideration of childhood priorities. © 2005 Swingler et al., licensee BioMed Central Ltd.
引用
收藏
页数:27
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]  
Murray C.J.L., Lopez A.D., The Global Burden of Disease, a Comprehensive Assessment of Mortality and Disability from Diseases, Injuries, and Risk Factors in 1990 and Projected to 2020, (1996)
[2]  
The State of the World's Children 2003, (2002)
[3]  
Dabis F., Orne-Gliemann J., Perez F., Leroy V., Newell M.L., Coutsoudis A., Et al., Working Group on Women and Child Health. Improving child health: The role of research, BMJ, 324, pp. 1444-1447, (2002)
[4]  
Mugambi M., Onsea G., Regional Consultative Process Africa. Report Prepared for International Conference on Health Research for Development, Oct 10-13, Bangkok, (2000)
[5]  
World Health Report: 2002: Reducing Risks, Promoting Healthy Life, (2002)
[6]  
ENHR activities and reports
[7]  
The 10/90 Report on Health Research 2000, (2000)
[8]  
Priorities for Health Research in Nigeria, (2001)
[9]  
Handbook for Health Systems/Operations Research at Local Government Level, (1993)
[10]  
Interim findings on the National PMTCT Pilot Sites, (2002)