Scientific Integrity Principles and Best Practices: Recommendations from a Scientific Integrity Consortium

被引:0
作者
Alison Kretser
Delia Murphy
Stefano Bertuzzi
Todd Abraham
David B. Allison
Kathryn J. Boor
Johanna Dwyer
Andrea Grantham
Linda J. Harris
Rachelle Hollander
Chavonda Jacobs-Young
Sarah Rovito
Dorothea Vafiadis
Catherine Woteki
Jessica Wyndham
Rickey Yada
机构
[1] ILSI North America,U.S. Department of Agriculture
[2] American Society for Microbiology,Department of Food Science and Human Nutrition
[3] Formerly of the ILSI Global Board of Trustees,undefined
[4] Indiana University School of Public Health,undefined
[5] Cornell University,undefined
[6] Tufts Medical Center,undefined
[7] Canadian Nutrition Society,undefined
[8] International Association for Food Protection,undefined
[9] University of California,undefined
[10] Formerly of The National Academies of Sciences,undefined
[11] Engineering,undefined
[12] and Medicine,undefined
[13] The National Academy of Engineering,undefined
[14] Center for Engineering Ethics and Society,undefined
[15] Agricultural Research Service,undefined
[16] Association of Public and Land-Grant Universities,undefined
[17] American Heart Association,undefined
[18] Iowa State University (Formerly of the U.S. Department of Agriculture,undefined
[19] Research,undefined
[20] Education,undefined
[21] and Economics),undefined
[22] American Association for the Advancement of Science,undefined
[23] University of British Columbia,undefined
[24] Kellan,undefined
[25] National Council on Aging,undefined
来源
Science and Engineering Ethics | 2019年 / 25卷
关键词
Culture of integrity; Responsible conduct of research (RCR); Quality of research; Open science; Research misconduct; Detrimental research practices;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
A Scientific Integrity Consortium developed a set of recommended principles and best practices that can be used broadly across scientific disciplines as a mechanism for consensus on scientific integrity standards and to better equip scientists to operate in a rapidly changing research environment. The two principles that represent the umbrella under which scientific processes should operate are as follows: (1) Foster a culture of integrity in the scientific process. (2) Evidence-based policy interests may have legitimate roles to play in influencing aspects of the research process, but those roles should not interfere with scientific integrity. The nine best practices for instilling scientific integrity in the implementation of these two overarching principles are (1) Require universal training in robust scientific methods, in the use of appropriate experimental design and statistics, and in responsible research practices for scientists at all levels, with the training content regularly updated and presented by qualified scientists. (2) Strengthen scientific integrity oversight and processes throughout the research continuum with a focus on training in ethics and conduct. (3) Encourage reproducibility of research through transparency. (4) Strive to establish open science as the standard operating procedure throughout the scientific enterprise. (5) Develop and implement educational tools to teach communication skills that uphold scientific integrity. (6) Strive to identify ways to further strengthen the peer review process. (7) Encourage scientific journals to publish unanticipated findings that meet standards of quality and scientific integrity. (8) Seek harmonization and implementation among journals of rapid, consistent, and transparent processes for correction and/or retraction of published papers. (9) Design rigorous and comprehensive evaluation criteria that recognize and reward the highest standards of integrity in scientific research.
引用
收藏
页码:327 / 355
页数:28
相关论文
共 26 条
  • [21] The Battlefield Health and Trauma Research Institute Scientific Ethics Committee: An evolving model for fostering a culture of integrity
    Ryan, Kathy L.
    Blackbourne, Lorne H.
    Cancio, Leopoldo C.
    Dunn, William J.
    Jordan, Bryan S.
    McClinton, Annette R.
    Nelson, Betty S.
    Rathbone, Christopher R.
    Ross, James D.
    Kragh, John F.
    JOURNAL OF TRAUMA AND ACUTE CARE SURGERY, 2012, 73 : S3 - S6
  • [22] Scientific Forensics: How the Office of Research Integrity can Assist Institutional Investigations of Research Misconduct During Oversight Review
    Dahlberg, John E.
    Davidian, Nancy M.
    SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING ETHICS, 2010, 16 (04) : 713 - 735
  • [23] Scientific Forensics: How the Office of Research Integrity can Assist Institutional Investigations of Research Misconduct During Oversight Review
    John E. Dahlberg
    Nancy M. Davidian
    Science and Engineering Ethics, 2010, 16 : 713 - 735
  • [24] Promoting scientific integrity through open science in health psychology: results of the Synergy Expert Meeting of the European health psychology society
    Kwasnicka, Dominika
    ten Hoor, Gill A.
    van Dongen, Anne
    Gruszczynska, Ewa
    Hagger, Martin S.
    Hamilton, Kyra
    Hankonen, Nelli
    Heino, Matti Toivo Juhani
    Kotzur, Marie
    Noone, Chris
    Rothman, Alexander J.
    Toomey, Elaine
    Warner, Lisa Marie
    Kok, Gerjo
    Peters, Gjalt-Jorn
    Luszczynska, Aleksandra
    HEALTH PSYCHOLOGY REVIEW, 2021, 15 (03) : 333 - 349
  • [25] Lessons from the COVID-19 pandemic and recent developments on the communication of clinical trials, publishing practices, and research integrity: in conversation with Dr. David Moher
    Lawson, Daeria O.
    Wang, Michael K.
    Kim, Kevin
    Eikelboom, Rachel
    Rodrigues, Myanca
    Trapsa, Daniela
    Thabane, Lehana
    Moher, David
    TRIALS, 2022, 23 (01)
  • [26] Lessons from the COVID-19 pandemic and recent developments on the communication of clinical trials, publishing practices, and research integrity: in conversation with Dr. David Moher
    Daeria O. Lawson
    Michael K. Wang
    Kevin Kim
    Rachel Eikelboom
    Myanca Rodrigues
    Daniela Trapsa
    Lehana Thabane
    David Moher
    Trials, 23